Trending December 2023 # Samsung’s Product Chief Dumbs Down Litigation With Apple To Rectangles # Suggested January 2024 # Top 21 Popular

You are reading the article Samsung’s Product Chief Dumbs Down Litigation With Apple To Rectangles updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Samsung’s Product Chief Dumbs Down Litigation With Apple To Rectangles

Wired sat down with Apple’s Jony Ive to talk design ahead of the trial of the century which kicked off in northern California today and the publication is now extending the courtesy to Samsung, interviewing its product person to hear the other side.

Samsung’s Kevin Packingham discussed patent and design accusations between his company and Apple, the result of which is bound to have serious ramifications for both parties. Unsurprisingly, the executive played down Apple’s concerns that the Galaxy tablets and smartphones copy the iPhone and iPad slavishly, pointing out there’s really just one way to go about the candy bar form factor…

Nathan Olivarez-Giles interviewed Samsung’s product chief Kevin Packingham for Wired. One of the most striking answers he gave shed light on the complicated Apple-Samsung relationship.

Even though the two companies are fighting fiercly for supremacy both in the fast-growing smartphone market and in the courtroom, Apple is also Samsung’s #1 buyer of components, often prepaying billions to secure multi-year supply of mobile displays, processors and NAND flash chips at prices no other buyer can match.

Asked how Samsung reconciles being both a business partner and a litigant, he responded cleverly:

The two parts of the company, they’re extremely isolated. There are times when I’m absolutely appalled that we sell what I consider to be the most innovative, most secret parts of the sauce of our products to some other manufacturer — HTC, LG, Apple, anybody.

And they [the components groups] are like, ‘Look, that’s none of your business. You go make your mobile phones and if you’d like to use our components, that’d be great.’ But you know, we also use Qualcomm components, and we source from other component manufacturers as well.

He’s right about Samsung’s mobile and components arms being two separate entities that don’t give each other preferential treatment. In addition to being the world’s leading smartphone and cell phone vendor, Samsung is also the world’s biggest maker of television sets and second-largest semiconductor manufacturer, right after Intel.

As for its legal fight with Apple over the look and feel of the iPhone:

In terms of patents, we have a made lot of contributions in the design space as well. I would say the patents we’re struggling with — where there’s a lot of discussion and litigation right now — are around these very broad design patents like a rectangle.

For us, it’s unreasonable that we’re fighting over rectangles, that that’s being considered as an infringement, which is why we’re defending ourselves.

The fighting-over-rectangles bit is sure to generate some nice headlines on Twitter.

The jury will get to see this, however.

Samsung, of course, has an infographic of its own.

He also shared this:

Hopefully the entire industry is in the position now where we have to defend ourselves and say, “Look, it’s unreasonable for us to be in the position of claiming that there is design, claiming that there is some sort of protected property, around a rectangle.”

So I would say, yeah, we have design patents as well, but they’re not as simple as the rectangle. And so that’s where I think you see a little bit of this challenge.

The industry at large is asking the same ‘rectangle’ question, the executive asserted:

Consumers want rectangles and we’re fighting over whether you can deliver a product in the shape of a rectangle.

I don’t think Apple’s patent infringement is as trivial as Packingham would have us believe, especially in that it boils down to the question of the candybar form factor.

Maybe he was just concerned about pre-trial set backs as his company won’t get to show off a Sony-inspired iPhone prototype to weaken Apple’s case. And news that Samsung wanted to subpoena a former Sony designer (who created said prototype) to testify in the case by sending him a $60 check also doesn’t bode well for the company.

After all, if it loses this patent trial of the century, as Fortune’s Philip Elmer-DeWitt put it, Samsung is quite possibly facing billions in damages and a mega-sales ban on its Galaxy smartphones and tablets for the entire United States, the world’s largest market for mobile devices.

Let’s see how the trial goes.

I’m sure we’ll be seeing lots of ups and downs in this litigation.


You're reading Samsung’s Product Chief Dumbs Down Litigation With Apple To Rectangles

Bloomberg Argues Apple Product Design Improved Since Jony Ive Left

A Bloomberg piece today argues that Apple product design has improved since former design chief Jony Ive left the company.

It says that without Steve Jobs’s moderating influence, Ive went too far in prioritizing form over function, and that this has since been corrected …

Jony Ive initially stepped back from product design leadership in 2023 to focus on the Apple Park campus, before returning to his original role two years later. He subsequently left the company in 2023. Apple claims that he still works with the company today in a consulting capacity.

Bloomberg‘s Alex Webb says that the pendulum is swinging back from cool to practical.

The Apple of today would not exist without Ive. He was the creative leviathan behind the look of the iMac, iPod, iPad and, most significantly, the iPhone. Apple’s design-led approach to product development was considered pioneering. But there was often a tension between form and function: whether a device’s appearance took precedence over its ease of use.

There was a sense that, without the moderating influence of the late Steve Jobs, perhaps Ive started to prioritize aesthetics a little too much. Since he stepped down as chief designer at the end of 2023, Apple seems to have reemphasized function. From the iPhone to Apple TV to the Macbook, gone are the days of “The user be damned, we think this looks cool.”

He argues that the new MacBook Pro is evidence of this.

Monday’s unveiling of a new Macbook Pro lineup of laptops provides evidence of the shift. Headline features released five years ago under Ive’s aegis have been scrapped. Gone is the so-called “butterfly” keyboard, which rendered the device thinner but whose clunky mechanics made typing more difficult; farewell too to the Touch Bar, a touch sensitive strip display along the top of the keyboard which could show functions for the web browser one moment and mixing tools for music apps the next, but was almost impossible to use without looking; back are HDMI ports, which let you plug the computer into high-definition displays without using an adapter.

Such arguments are always tricky, as Apple designs products years ahead of their launch, so it’s difficult to say who would have been leading any particular design. It’s even more difficult where Ive is concerned, given the fluctuating nature of his role.

When Apple announced Ive’s departure in 2023, I argued that he really checked out four years earlier.

Ive had already stepped back from direct responsibility for hardware and software design back in 2023. The official line at the time was that it was a promotion, but it was clear to everyone that this was Ive taking a less hands-on role.

My suspicion is that Ive wanted to leave then, but Apple was able to hold onto him by letting him go play with his new toy – Apple Park – while handing off his other responsibilities.

I’m very much of the view that Jony Ive leaving Apple really happened back in 2023. I think the idea of the designer freelancing for Apple is PR spin, just as his promotion was the first time around.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

72 Hours With The Samsung Galaxy S10E: Thoughts On Samsung’s Small Boi

How to sell your Galaxy S9 and upgrade to the Galaxy S10


I would’ve liked the fingerprint sensor a few millimeters lower, though. It’s just high enough to where I need to pick up my phone a bit differently than normal to reach it. However, this isn’t a deal breaker by any means.

I’ve found myself taking a ton of accidental screenshots when I turn the volume down on the S10e, as it’s very easy to also press the power button. This is a slight annoyance, but an annoyance nonetheless.

The fingerprint sensor is super quick to unlock the phone — after you figure out how to consistently trigger it. Your finger has to cover the entire sensor to work. Due to the location and long shape of the sensor, this can result in lots of failed attempts to unlock the phone.

One UI is awesome

Samsung Galaxy S10 vs LG G8 ThinQ!


Aesthetically, One UI looks great. It merges the best of vanilla Android Pie with Samsung’s new design language. As a result, Samsung’s stock apps and various settings menus are refined and pleasing to use. Also, the system-wide night mode is wonderful.

I still have a few qualms with the launcher. The app drawer still scrolls horizontally, unlike just about every other smartphone’s app drawer. The app folders on the Samsung launcher are annoying too — apps at the top of the folders are hard to reach, and frankly the design of the folders doesn’t seem like it’s been touched in years.

Aside from those few nitpicks, One UI on the Galaxy S10e has been a joy to use.

Early Samsung Galaxy S10e camera samples

Rear cameras:

12MP wide-angle sensor, Super Speed Dual Pixel autofocus, OIS, 1.4μm pixels, 77-degree field-of-view, dual aperture ƒ/1.5 and ƒ/2.4 apertures

16MP ultra-wide sensor, 1.0μm pixels, 123-degree field-of-view, ƒ/2.2 aperture

Front camera:

10MP sensor, Dual Pixel autofocus, 1.22μm pixels, 80-degree field-of-view, ƒ/1.9 aperture

Random thoughts on software, battery, and more

There’s just so much “stuff” (read: bloatware) preloaded on the S10e. Why do we need two calculator apps? It’ll be even worse for carrier-specific models, too.

I still don’t like that there are two app stores out of the box. I know a few people who have switched to a Samsung phone from an iPhone and don’t know the difference between the two app stores.

I remapped the Bixby button to open the Google app. Samsung unfortunately doesn’t let you remap it to the Google Assistant app, but if you want to put in some extra work there’s a way around that.

I like that Samsung is shipping all Galaxy S10 models with pre-installed screen protectors. I don’t like buying and applying screen protectors myself, so this is a nice touch. If only mine wasn’t ever-so-slightly off center.

It’s too early to give you my final thoughts on the S10e’s battery life. So far, the 3,100mAh cell seems to offer more than enough juice to last a full day. I’ve achieved around five hours of screen-on time each day, which I’d say is above average compared to similar small flagship phones. Five hours might not seem great, but it beats the pants of the Pixel 3’s battery life.

This is by no means a full Galaxy S10e review. I still need to dig deeper into the cameras and battery life, and see if performance holds up in a week’s time. Stay tuned for our full review next week!

Chief Executive Officer Vs Managing Director

Difference Between Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director

The two key and senior-most company members are the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director. The duties of the CEO are often confused with those of the MD and vice versa. However, both Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director can perform duties similarly to each other. Still, the mere existence of these two corporate titles indicates that there will be a substantial difference in their roles. Both report to the Board of Directors. More recently, organizations have started identifying the significance of the two roles and incorporated them into their structure.

Start Your Free Investment Banking Course

Chief Executive Officer: A senior executive of a company’s management who makes important decisions related to a company.

Managing Director: A senior member of the Board of Directors after the Chairman / Vice-Chairman who manages the everyday operations of the company

Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director Infographics

Below is the top 5 difference between Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director.

Key Differences Between Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director

Both Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director are the organization’s topmost and most important positions. Let us discuss some of the major differences :

CEO & MD plays a vital role in an organization. There are a few pointers that differentiate one from another:

CEO is focused on future-oriented goals, whereas MD handles day to day operations of the company

As a firm representative, the CEO handles the outside world, like media and other public events, whereas MD plays the main role inside the firm.

Both Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director reports to the Chairman. On the other hand, in many cases, MD reports to the CEO as well.

Main responsibilities:

1. CEO

Achieving strategic goals set up under corporate governance

Making long-term and short-term strategies for the company

Proposed delegation of power to other executives, which is approved by the Board of Directors

2. MD

To attain goals in line with the mission and vision devised by the Board of Directors

Reviewing the performance of the company of various departments and taking corrective measures

The hiring of supporting staff and supervising people of various departments such as sales, production, procurement, etc

Monitoring expenditures and keeping the profitability of the company intact

Supporting CEO for improvement of operations

Figure:1 – Corporate Structure of a Company

Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director Comparison Table

Basis Of Comparison 

Chief Executive Officer

Managing Director

A level in an organization Member of the Board of Directors and reports to the Chairman

Responsibilities CEO is mainly focusing on managerial activities as well as guiding other executive officers

Responsible for the overall performance of the Company

Looks after the performance of individual divisions collectively

Decision making Works on decisions made by the Board of Directors Helps the Board in making strategies and policies

Public face  CEO represents the company publicly in case of any corporate event. Examples: Mark Zuckerberg,   Sundar Pichai, Bill Gates Managing Director doesn’t represent the company publicly at first, except in the case where the same person holds both the titles

Association CEO liaises between management and the board MD performs duties additional to those of the board and communicates with the CEO and Chairman to maintain a positive relationship

Common Goals of Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director

Running a firm successfully: Irrespective of internal and external factors, the ultimate goal of the CEO & MD is to achieve a business objective and run the company’s operations smoothly.

Code of conduct: The CEO / MD expects to maintain integrity as a CEO is no less than a firm representative of the outside world. On the other hand, MD mainly represents the firm internally by leading and motivating company employees and by setting up examples.

Accountable to the Board of Directors: The CEO / MD must keep the Board informed on the status of policies, goals, and targets defined under corporate governance.

CEO and MD as Separate Roles

The increasing complexities in the current business environment have increased the importance of having two different positions. The concept of separate MD and CEO started from US-based firms, and it got acceptance by the UK and European-based entities due to increased difficulties in the corporate environment.

Although the roles and responsibilities of both titles depend on factors such as legal structure, size of the company, and Article of Association defined under Corporate Governance, which may vary from company to company, in small organizations, creating a different level is not required.

Scenarios that Define the Roles

Multiple titles:

A person with multiple titles like CEO, MD, and Chairman is mainly found where the company belongs to Founder or has been running as a family business for generations. Example: Mukesh Ambani – Chairman and Managing Director of Reliance Industries; Mark Zuckerberg – CEO and Chairman of Facebook

Ideal practice:

Separating these two posts is desirable and considered a good governance practice in public and large private companies as it avoids overlapping powers & authority.


Elon Musk, CEO and Ex-Chair of Tesla resigned as Chairman in October 2023 under fraud charges.

These allegations came to light after his statement of taking his company (Tesla) private, indicating unreported funds’ availability.

As a part of a settlement agreed by SEC, he had to step down as Chairman along with a penalty of $20m while keeping the position of CEO intact.

The main objective of separating his position of CEO from Chairman is to make him focus solely on the company’s operation and not on shareholders’ demand.

Conclusion Recommended Articles

This has been a guide to the top difference between Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director. Here we also discuss the Chief Executive Officer vs Managing Director key differences with infographics and a comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more.

How Apple Can Get Users To Connect With Apple Music’s Connect

Apple’s Connect service, the company’s own aspiring social component to Apple Music, has visibly taken a back seat in iOS 10. In its original conception, Connect was resourceful and prominently placed in Music. Fast forward one year and you would be forgiven for thinking that Apple’s network for musicians and their followers had been as good as abandoned over night.

Why did I not notice earlier? Presumably because Apple did not deliver the goods with iOS 9 and gave very little impetus to repeatedly check in on my artists’ Connect posts. It was never habit-forming as its features, or lack thereof, did not resonate enough with me to remind myself of its existence on a day to day basis. Sooner than later, the Connect icon became nothing but an idle tab wedged in between Radio and My Music.

Before picking apart the shortcomings of Connect, one needs to spare a thought for Apple and the conundrum they now face. With iOS 9 they were bold believers of Connect (promoted and highlighted like in the image above) and copped an echo unsavoury enough to relegate the service to almost-oblivion. But shunned as it is now, future improvements will also escape most users’ notice – because out of sight, out of mind.

The key would therefore be to subtly promote Connect back to Music’s main interface, without displacing the new hierarchy in the bottom row of icons. Alternatively, talks of a standalone app for Connect could resurface, especially in light of a crucial deal Apple recently struck with an audience-grabbing pop culture fad.

Plan A

Secondly, there are plenty of other deft ways to display Connect content in Music without forcing a dedicated tab down our throats. When I tap the album art in my Podcast app, the cover flips around and offers me show-notes. A mechanism like this for Apple Music would make checking your artists’ latest status so, so easy. When you start to listen to a song and glance at the album cover, wouldn’t it be cool to be able to hit that album and read what they have been up to on Connect?

Plan A requires more intuitive snippets of Connect sprinkled here and there inside Music, as opposed to a full blown tab. Furthermore, integration of Connect into other Apple apps, such as Apple News, would enrich News on the one hand and most certainly boost engagement with Connect on the other.

Plan B

Take the Connect out of Music and launch a brand new Connect app. Said application would have to nicely link and jump between Apple’s social network and Apple Music (similar to how Facebook has split Facebook from Messenger), and would give Apple the opportunity to unleash something big, colorful and beautiful on the inside.

Apple Music in itself is a beast, which impacts and constraints Connect’s depth notably. You just cannot have a fully fledged app inside another app. Therefore, offering a new platform that houses a far richer social component, including chat functionality amongst followers or possibly discussion boards, could attract the same people feeling uninvolved with Connect right now. At the same time, Connect could also easily disassociate from the reputation of delivering music related content only, a shift that Apple is eventually likely to make anyway. Connect could represent the new haven for all subscription-based entertainment distributed by Apple.

A fitting moment to pull the trigger on the transformation of Connect would be in early 2023, when Apple are reportedly set to release the first instalments of Carpool Karaoke. As peculiar as the acquisition of it seemed at the time, there is no doubt Apple will ensure it gets proper exposure when released. What better way to promote a new app and the singing skits than to introduce a brand new icon on your home screen?

Does Connect still have enough fight left?

It remains to be seen if Apple still has hopes for the Connect platform. Time is definitely not on its side and a facelift or complete overhaul becomes more unlikely with every day passing, in as much as innovation is only going to stick with customers if they haven’t already dismissed the product. This leaves us with the second approach. Is it feasible? Absolutely. Could Apple be of the same opinion? We will find out.

The proposition of Connect is great and we know Apple has the muscles to push it, but they will have to prove they also have the smarts.

Informatica Powercenter: Product Overview And Insight

See Informatica PowerCenter user reviews.

Jump to: Informatica PowerCenter Features Table

As an enterprise cloud data management vendor, Informatica focuses on big data, data security, data quality, data integration and master data management software. Founded in 1993, the company has its headquarters in Redwood City, California, and it has more than 3,900 employees. It boasts more than 9,000 customers, including 85 of the companies on the Fortune 100 list. Noteworthy customers include the AARP, Ace Hardware, the U.S. Air Force, BMC Software, BT, CA Technologies, the Chicago Cubs, Comcast, eBay, FannieMae, HP, Humana, Michigan State University, Nissan, PayPal, Qualcomm, Thomon Reuters, Thrifty Car Rental, Toshiba, Valero, Unilever, Verizon, Western Union and others. It processes more than 2.5 trillion cloud transactions every month.

The company was previously traded on the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol INFA. In 2023, it was acquired by Permira, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Microsoft and Salesforce Ventures for approximately $3.5 billion. Since then, it has been privately held. Informatica’s annual revenue is more than $1 billion.

Informatica received the highest rating and was listed in the Leaders quadrant in the most recent Gartner Magic Quadrant for Data Integration Tools and the Magic Quadrant for integration platform as a service (iPaaS). The report added, “Informatica continues to be the vendor most referenced by Gartner clients. It appears in more than 75% of the contract review calls for data integration tools and features most frequently in competitive situations on our inquiry calls.”

On premises or on Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Microsoft Azure


The on-premises version of PowerCenter runs on Windows, Linux or AIX and requires 6 GB RAM and 10 GB disk space. Additional requirements will depend on the configuration of the software.

PowerCenter connectors are available through an add-on called PowerExchange Connectors. It includes connectors for databases, data warehouses, Hadoop, messaging systems, enterprise applications, mainframes, midrange systems, social media networks and cloud applications. Additional add-ons are available for more cloud applications and change data capture.

Graphical, code-less environment

Business and IT collaboration features

Code-less development environment


Meta-driven data management


Fast performance

Zero downtime

Universal connectivity

Rapid prototyping, profiling and validation

Business glossary

Advance data transformation

Real-time engine

Cloud connectivity

Certification, training, support and services are available.

AWS pricing starts at $3.50 per hour ($24,528 per year). Azure and on-premises pricing not disclosed.

Features Informatica PowerCenter

Deployment On premises, AWS, or Microsoft Azure

System Requirements

Operating System Windows, Linux, AIX

Processor Depends on configuration


Storage 10 GB

Software Depends on configuration

Connectors Available through an add-on

Design and Development Environment Graphical, code-less

Key Capabilities



CDC Available through an add-on

Data Quality No (available through other Informatica products)

Data Governance No (available through other Informatica products)

Others Metadata-driven management, automated data validation testing, real-time engine, machine learning

Support and Services Certification, training, support, services

Gartner Magic Quadrant Rating Leader

Price AWS pricing starts at $3.50 per hour ($24,528 per year). Azure and on-premises pricing not disclosed.

Features Informatica PowerCenter

Deployment On premises, AWS, or Microsoft Azure

System Requirements

Operating System Windows, Linux, AIX

Processor Depends on configuration


Storage 10 GB

Software Depends on configuration

Connectors Available through an add-on

Design and Development Environment Graphical, code-less

Key Capabilities



CDC Available through an add-on

Data Quality No (available through other Informatica products)

Data Governance No (available through other Informatica products)

Others Metadata-driven management, automated data validation testing, real-time engine, machine learning

Support and Services Certification, training, support, services

Gartner Magic Quadrant Rating Leader

Price AWS pricing starts at $3.50 per hour ($24,528 per year). Azure and on-premises pricing not disclosed.

Update the detailed information about Samsung’s Product Chief Dumbs Down Litigation With Apple To Rectangles on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!