You are reading the article More (Google) Serps Research With Yolink updated in December 2023 on the website Achiashop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 More (Google) Serps Research With Yolink
Yolink is a nice new tool that searches through the content linked from the current page (available to both FireFox and Google Chrome users). Basically, it works as follows:
I found the tool especially useful for various SERPs research.
Let me show one example: let’s say my main keyword is [diabetic diets] and I want to research which (and how many) pages found for its core term [diets] mention [diabetes] or [diabetic]. My steps would be:
1. (With Yolink installed) I search Google for [diets];
3. Now I can watch the tool generate snippets from the linked pages and highlight my search term:
The listing number represents the link on the base page (which is Google SERPs in our case);
If there are several extracts containing the search term within one listing, they will be marked with letters;
When you hover over any listing in Yolink results, you will be able to see its number on the base page:
4. Now just scroll through results to see which pages contain your term and how they use it:
Isn’t it useful?
More things you can do with Yolink:
Scan the current page links or text;
Send results directly to Blogger, WordPress, Facebook or Twitter.
Do you see yourself using this tool? Please share your thoughts!
The tool was reviewed under SEJ policy.
You're reading More (Google) Serps Research With Yolink
Role Of Internet In Research
Our lives are complete with the internet. From entertainment to work, the internet finds its use in all domains, making it easier for people to access resources worldwide. The internet has truly shortened the distance between people, and in turn, it has broadened access to information. This makes the internet an excellent tool for research. A methodical, scientific investigation of a particular issue or topic is known as research. It is a means to learn new things and find answers to queries about our world.
Numerous subjects, including physics, engineering, the social sciences, and the humanities, are open to research. It may involve various tasks, like carrying out experiments, gathering and evaluating data, and reading academic literature. The purpose of the study is to deepen our comprehension of a subject and add to the corpus of knowledge in a certain area. For others to utilize and build upon the work, research is frequently conducted to publish the findings in a scientific journal or conference proceedings.
Role of the Internet in ResearchThe Internet is a huge research resource that offers access to various materials on almost any subject. Scholarly articles, books, and other information sources are more accessible than ever because of the growth of internet databases and digital libraries. Additionally, the Internet is vital for researcher collaboration and communication because it allows them to exchange thoughts, information, and findings instantly. However, other people contend that the Internet is not a trustworthy source of information since not all of the data found there is dependable or accurate. It is crucial to assess the material attentively and keep the sources’ reliability in mind.
Furthermore, there are concerns about plagiarism and how simple it is to copy and paste text from the Internet without giving proper credit also exist. There are security and privacy issues when using the Internet for research. As a result, it is crucial to use critical thinking while assessing the reliability of sources discovered online. When employing sources for research, it is equally crucial to correctly reference them to acknowledge the original writers and guarantee that your work is appropriately credited.
How Does Internet Aid Research?There are many ways in which the Internet can aid research, some of which include
Providing access to vast information − The Internet allows researchers to access various information on virtually any topic, including scholarly articles, books, and other sources.
Facilitating communication and collaboration − The Internet enables researchers to communicate and collaborate in real-time, regardless of their geographic location. This can be especially useful for researchers working on large, international projects.
Enabling online research tools − Many online research tools, such as survey platforms and data analysis software, can help researchers collect and analyze data more efficiently.
Allowing for the sharing of research results − Researchers can use the Internet to share their research results with others through online platforms such as research repositories and social media.
Facilitating research publication − The Internet has made it easier for researchers to publish their work, as many journals now accept submissions and publish articles online.
Overall, the Internet is an invaluable resource for researchers, providing access to information, facilitating communication and collaboration, and enabling online research tools.
Cons for Research Using the InternetThere are a few potential problems with using the Internet for research, including
The credibility of sources − It is important to be mindful of the sources found on the Internet, as not all information is reliable. Evaluating the information critically and verifying the sources’ accuracy is important.
Plagiarism − It is easy to unintentionally plagiarize when using the Internet for research, as it is easy to copy and paste text without proper citation. It is important to cite sources properly to avoid plagiarism and to give credit to the original authors.
Information overload − With so much information on the Internet, it can be challenging to sort through it all and find the most relevant and reliable sources. It is important to be selective and to focus on high-quality sources.
Security and privacy − There are security and privacy concerns to consider when using the Internet for research, particularly when handling sensitive data. It is important to use secure communication methods and protect personal information.
While the Internet is a valuable resource for research, it is important to be aware of these potential problems and to take steps to address them.
Ethical Considerations While Using the Internet for ResearchTo ethically use the Internet for research, here are a few things to consider
Evaluate the credibility of sources − Not all information on the Internet is reliable, so it is important to evaluate the credibility of sources. Look for sources from reputable organizations or individuals, and consider the authors’ credentials.
Properly cite sources − It is important to cite them properly in your research to give credit to the original authors and avoid plagiarism. Follow the citation style guidelines appropriate for your field of study.
Protect sensitive data − If you are handling sensitive data during your research, it is important to take steps to protect it. This may include using secure methods of communication, such as encrypted email, and storing data securely.
Obtain necessary permissions − If you use someone else’s work in your research, be sure to obtain the necessary permissions. This may include obtaining permission to use images, videos, or other copyrighted material.
Respect intellectual property rights − It is important to respect intellectual property rights and to use copyrighted material only following the law. This may include obtaining permission to use the material or using it within the limits of fair use.
ConclusionThe Internet is a useful tool for research because it gives access to a wide range of material, makes it easier for researchers to communicate and work together, and makes it possible to employ online research tools. However, it is crucial to exercise critical thought while evaluating the reliability of sources discovered online. When conducting research online, it is equally crucial to credit sources and upholds intellectual property rights properly. By adhering to these rules, researchers can utilize the Internet as a useful resource for their study ethically and responsibly.
Google Translate, Towards Better Understanding And Favoring More Language
Google Translate and its users
Has 230 million consumers in India.
Neural Machine Translation to auto-translate much of the Internet at 11 among the most popularly utilized Indian languages available on Chrome browsers: Urdu, Sindhi, Bengali, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, Gujarati, Punjabi, Malayalam, Kannada, and Hindi.
Google Maps supports Hindi, Kannada, Punjabi, Malayalam, Gujarati, Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Bengali and Nepali.
Voice navigation in Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, Kannada, Telugu, Malayalam, and Gujarati.
Gboard now supports 50 Indian languages through text input. Adding Tulu, that has less than two million Gboard users.
Offline Translation and Gboard voice input encouraged in Hindi, Bengali, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu.
If you can not speak Tamil, then you’re better off with Ola or even Uber. But there are times when you want to jump in an autorickshaw without needing to await a taxi. For example, obtaining an autorickshaw out of Elliot’s Beach into Indira Nagar channel in Chennai are a great deal faster than reserving a taxi. ‘Automobiles, autos everywhere. But maybe not a ride .’
Lately I used Google Translate’s sound translation attribute to communicate with all autorickshaw drivers. What originally appeared quite bizarre to the two people, finally was quite funny and quite powerful. It helped reserve an autorickshaw ride metre and $10 additional. That’s a deal I will take daily.
Before and nowIn a country where 23 languages are constitutionally recognised, technology like Google Translate offers a great way to bridge the linguistic barrier and understand each other.
Launched in 2006, Google Translate initially translated text into English, before translating into the selected language using predictive algorithms. In 2010, it was added as an app on Android devices and in 2011 on iOS. The tech had improved so much that the platform was seen as a portable personal interpreter. By now, Google Chrome could pronounce the text, recognise words in the picture and spot unfamiliar text and languages.
Now, the Google Translate program offers enhanced translations with the camera, sound and handwriting, due to NMT’s profound learning capacities. Because of this, more individuals can get the Android operating platform, Google Maps and Google Pay services.
When you have not tinkered with all the Google Translate program in some time, I suggest testing your mobile personal interpreter’s abilities. The enhanced speed and precision will probably surprise you.
Also read:
Top 5 Automation Tools to Streamline Workflows for Busy IT Teams
Calibrating expectations
Search Geek Weekly News Update; Google Social Search & More
It’s been another week in the trenches and while it may have been a little slow out there, we did have some big news with Google Social Search. Question remains, will it really be a game changer or just another vertical? And what the SEO community lacked in activity, we did come across more IR geekiness, which makes this old horse a happy camper. We’ve also got a few interesting patents and more…
I hope this edition finds you well… Enjoy!
Lead StoryWhen the news broke last week of Google’s Social Search going live, I thought, ‘this has got to be the big story of the week’. At the end of the day I’d say, maybe/maybe not. What we do know is that Google is once more looking to ‘get social’ and there is certainly interest. The part that isn’t as clear, much like Search/Side Wiki before it, is the level of adoption.
As a fella that has been following Google’s personalization/social trail the last few years, it was an interesting development. The burning question is always, “what effect will it have on SEO?”. There were those that said personalization would mean a massive change in what we do, that too, was a bit of an ambitious assertion.
Unless there are wholesale changes to its current implementation, I can’t see this being a game changer. Yes, it will likely present a new vertical with new opportunities, but beyond that it would seem this development will be limited in its effect on us.
Here’s a ton of coverage for you;
My own review!
Google;
Usual Suspects;
Read Write Web
Search Engine Land
The Noisy Channel
BlogStorm
Bruce Clay
Now let’s get on with the rest of this week’s search goodiness shall we?
Buzz Bin Search Geek Central Search Patents/end SOSG session
‘7 Days of Search and Social’ is a joint effort from Search Engine Journal and the SEO Training Dojo to bring you the latest in SEO and Social Search news. Each week (on Tuesdays) we’ll be posting the highlights of the most recent (SEO Geeks) newsletter here on Search Engine Journal.
Be sure to grab the SEJ feed for the latest or sign up to the SEO Dojo newsletter to get it straight to your inbox.
Teacher Development Research Review: Avoiding Pitfalls
Every teacher can probably describe a boring or downright ineffective professional-development experience they’ve had. There are many challenges when trying to design a successful and engaging PD program for ongoing teacher education. Whether you’re an administrator looking for useful tips or an educator who wants to hone your own skills, the research-based hints below will help you avoid some of the most common problems and mistakes in PD programs.
Simply increasing time for professional learning will not in and of itself improve teacher practice. Effective professional learning time must be purposefully structured (Guskey and Yoon, 2009, citing Birman et al., 2000; Garet et al., 2001; Guskey, 1999).
Customize Professional Development PracticesNo single professional-development practice, strategy, approach, method, or activity works well under all conditions. Professional development must be focused on both learning and learners and it should actively involve all stakeholders in collectively constructing and re-constructing a shared vision of effective teaching for the local school context. As conditions change, improvement efforts at all levels should be poised to adapt. Borko (2004) has found that successful PD programs work because dedicated facilitators are available to troubleshoot, customize, and adapt PD endeavors to support schools’ specific learning needs. Partnering with universities or professional organizations can help to provide the support infrastructure for professional development (Jaquith, Mindich, Wei, and Darling-Hammond, 2010). Several states provide professional-development infrastructures and resources, such as Missouri’s Regional Professional Development Centers, Colorado’s Educator Effectiveness office, and The Educational Information and Resource Center.
Remember, Learning is a Journey, Not a DestinationFocusing too much on the “weight” of the chicken rather than the “feed” can undermine the process of authentic professional learning and the positive climate necessary for growth. After an extensive review of the professional-development literature, Webster-Wright (2009) proposed that educators shift the discourse from delivering and evaluating PD programs to understanding and supporting authentic professional learning as it is situated in the everyday context where it occurs. Authentic professional learning lends itself to design thinking, an iterative cycle that includes designing, testing, troubleshooting, and redesigning.
Give Constructive FeedbackAuthentic professional learning requires methods for reflection and feedback. American Institutes for Research offers a Web-based service called Professional Development Activity Log, which supports longitudinal data collection on professional development implementation and teachers’ self-reported knowledge, skills, and changes in teaching practice. After extensive research on teacher evaluation procedures, the Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer-colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students’ perceptions of teachers’ ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multiple years.
Build Trust Between Administrators and Teaching StaffGreat leaders focus on developing people’s capacities rather than their limitations (Leithwood, Seashore Louis, Anderson, and Wahlstrom, 2004; Alliance for Excellent Education, 2011). Teachers generally take three to five years to develop their craft, and changes in teacher knowledge and practice must be rather large to see changes in students’ test scores. Correlational evidence shows that sizable changes in teacher-related variables are associated with much smaller changes in student learning outcomes (Hill, Rowan, and Ball, 2005; Hanushek and Rivkin, 2012). “Strong caring leadership” is a major source of support for teachers (Beltman, Mansfield, and Price, 2011).
Continue to the next section of the Teacher Development Research Review, Annotated Bibliography.
Bu Poised To Impact Cancer Research
BU Poised to Impact Cancer Research Cross-campus collaboration nets $2 million NIH nanomedicine grant
Scanning electron microscope image (above) of an array of microfabricated particles being developed for use as a multi-spectral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent. (Xin Zhang, Stephan Anderson)
The National Cancer Institute’s Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer has tapped a multidisciplinary research team, comprising members of the Charles River and Medical Campuses, to launch a training center to help grow the next generation of nanomedicine researchers in cancer. The announcement comes with a five-year, $2 million grant.
An offshoot of nanotechnology, nanomedicine is medical intervention at the molecular scale for treating disease or repairing damaged tissues. A nanometer is one-billionth of a meter, too small to be seen through a conventional laboratory microscope. Biological molecules and structures inside living cells typically operate at less than 100 nanometers. Harnessing nanoparticles to deliver drugs, heat, light, or other substances to specific cells could dramatically alter the future of diagnoses, prognoses, and treatments for a range of diseases. Traditional chemotherapy, for example, is delivered through the vein and exposes the entire body to its potent effects.
“If you can deliver chemotherapy specifically to sites, you not only concentrate the chemotherapy at the site of the tumor, but decrease the side effects and off-target effects,” says Douglas Faller, a School of Medicine professor, director of the BU Cancer Center, and one of the grant’s primary investigators. “We’re taking a very blunt instrument, systemic chemotherapy, and turning it into a targeted approach.”
In 2009, cancer was responsible for over 550,000 deaths in the United States, approximately one out of every four, according to the researchers. New diagnoses in 2010 are anticipated to top 1.5 million and deaths to come close to 570,000, with projections growing as the population ages.
The $2 million training center grant, distributed under the umbrella of the National Institutes of Health, will allow graduate students and postdoctoral fellows at BU to train in research labs focused on developing diagnostic and therapeutic tools for various types of cancer, from purification of micro RNAs—molecules that play an important role in gene regulation—to the development of noninvasive imaging and detection of cancer cells. The center will be called the Boston University Center for Cross-Disciplinary Training in Nanotechnology for Cancer.
A new cross-disciplinary course, Introduction to Nanomedicine, has also been developed and will be cotaught by faculty from both physical and life sciences and engineering, as well as by medical researchers, and codirected by Katya Ravid, a MED professor of medicine and biochemistry and director of the Evans Center Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research (Evans Center), and Mario Cabodi, a College of Engineering research assistant professor of biomedical engineering.
“I have always believed in the power of trainees to serve as a bridge between departments and faculty, through exchange of concepts, technologies, and participation in common workshops,” Ravid says.
BU’s multidisciplinary research effort, known as the Nanomedicine Initiative, brings together the Charles River Campus Center for Nanoscience and Nanobiotechnology (CNN) with the Cancer Center, the Evans Center, and the MED department of medicine on the Medical Campus. “We think this grant is a stepping-stone to even bigger things,” says CNN director Bennett Goldberg, a College of Arts & Sciences physics professor and one of the grant’s primary investigators.
“Another important aspect to the award is being part of the NCI Alliance, which will couple our efforts with other centers for cancer nanotechnology around the country,” Goldberg adds. “For example, locally the MIT/Harvard center will be sending their students to our workshops, and we will make use of their nanomaterials toxicology testing lab.”
The story of BU’s cross-campus medical collaboration began in fall 2008—well before the NIH announced the training centers program—when CNN, the Evans Center, MED’s department of medicine (DoM), and Andrei Ruckenstein, vice president and associate provost for research and a CAS professor of physics, saw an opportunity for the University and began pursuing a new program in nanomedicine. At the heart of the mission: build long-term collaborations across the two campuses. Goldberg and Ravid began organizing meetings with physics and engineering colleagues and MED researchers and clinicians and set up a series of lectures and workshops explaining how nanotechnology could impact cancer, cardiovascular disease, and infectious disease.
Nanodroplets for delivery of therapeutic agents. (Tyrone Porter, David Seldin). Image credit: Aysegul Yonet
In fall 2009, Goldberg, in collaboration with Ravid, representing the Evans Center, announced a request for funding proposals, requiring that the research include faculty from both MED, and on the Charles River Campus, nanotechnology. CNN, with the support of the Evans Center, DoM, ENG, CAS, the Provost’s Office, and the Photonics Center, funded 11 seed projects. They include: developing a screening test for thyroid cancer, using ultrasound to release drugs from nanoparticles, and studying tumor cell circulation and adhesion. In total, $400,000 was committed internally and led to more than 30 researchers, clinicians, and faculty from across the University working together. This work later formed the basis for the NIH grant application.
“The coupling of a serious commitment to excellence in training with a strong, interdisciplinary research focus is what the Alliance was looking for when it established the Cancer Nanotechnology Training Centers initiative,” says Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer spokesperson Dorothy Farrell. “We expect that the BU center’s combined strengths in research and training will produce young scientists who will bridge the divide between scientific research and clinical application and be capable of moving cancer nanotechnology to the next stage of development.”
Karen Antman, dean of MED and provost of the Medical Campus, says she is thrilled about the NIH award. “Hopefully, this successful collaboration will inspire other innovative collaborations between faculty on the two campuses.”
Caleb Daniloff can be reached at [email protected].
Explore Related Topics:
Update the detailed information about More (Google) Serps Research With Yolink on the Achiashop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!