Trending December 2023 # Ionic 4 Vs Ionic 3 # Suggested January 2024 # Top 17 Popular

You are reading the article Ionic 4 Vs Ionic 3 updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Ionic 4 Vs Ionic 3

Difference Between Ionic 4 vs Ionic 3

Start Your Free Software Development Course

Web development, programming languages, Software testing & others

Head to Head Comparison Between Ionic 4 and Ionic 3 (Infographics)

Key Difference Between Ionic 4 andIonic 3

Let us look at the key differences between as below Ionic 4 and Ionic 3:

Ionic 4 has a version release for every six months, whereas ionic 3 has no release like this.

@ symbol is used in ionic 4 to start the name of the package. Ionic 3 has no @ symbol in its package syntax.

Ionic 4 allows updates from each supported framework, whereas ionic 3 does not allow updates from the supported framework.

The latest version of React and JavaScript is used in ionic 4, whereas ionic 3 does not use React and JavaScript.

Ionic 4 was built to use the web components in the framework. Ionic 3 does not allow the use of web components in its framework.

Life cycle events used in ionic 3 is updated and used in ionic 4. Ionic 4 uses the events provided by Angular.

API is promise-based in ionic 4, whereas it is not promise based in ionic 3.

Ionic 3 navigation was based on a simple stack, whereas ionic 4 uses an Angular router to integrate with the applications.

App Page module is exported for lazy loading in ionic 4, and the Home Page module is exported in ionic 3.

The applications are linkable in ionic 4, whereas it is not linkable in ionic 3.

New pages are pushed to the top in ionic 3, while in ionic 4, pages are arranged in a better manner.

Ionic 4 and Ionic 3 Comparison Table

Ionic 4 Ionic 3

Ionic 4 do not have the custom style and supports the setup from each framework recommended. Ionic 3 has a custom style for the folder structure and app set up.

Overlay components in ionic 4 are created asynchronously. Overlay components in ionic 3 are created synchronously.

Navigation is more consistent in ionic 4. Navigation is not consistent as ionic 4.

Ionic 4 has a rich animation. The animation is not good in ionic 3.

The base framework need not be bonded in ionic 4. It is necessary to bind the base framework in ionic 3.

The command-line interface has many features in ionic 4. The command-line interface has less features in ionic 3.

NavController and ion-nav are not used in ionic 4. Ionic 3 uses NavController and ion-nav.

The app-routing module is created automatically in ionic 4. The app-routing module is not created automatically in ionic 3.

ngOninit and ngAfterViewinit are used in ionic 4 for navigation lifecycles. ionWillLoad is used in ionic 3 for navigation lifecycles.

Router-link helps to navigate between pages in ionic 4.

Reactive forms have to be imported to each page. App module has to be imported on each page.

Ionic 4 can work with multi frameworks. Ionic 3 cannot work with multi frameworks.

Ionic 4 is faster. Ionic 3 is not faster.

Full-screen components are present in ionic 4. Full-screen components are not available in ionic 3.

Rows and columns are displayed on top of the app using an ion-picker. Ionic 3 does not have an ion picker option.

Material design interaction is better in ionic 4. Material design interaction is not good in ionic 3.

When the URLs are matched, the route is shown clearly by the ion router. Ion router is not available in ionic 3.

The items are reordered using ion-reorder in ionic 4. The items are not reordered by itself.

Search bars present help in searching the texts using different styles. The search bar does not have different styles in ionic 3.

Child contents are shown automatically. Child contents are not shown automatically in ionic 3.

CSS variables become the main component in ionic 4. Ionic 3 does not have CSS variables.

Colours can be changed frequently in ionic 4. Colours cannot be changed frequently in ionic 3.

Icons developed in ionic 4 can be used in android and desktop apps. Icons developed in ionic 3 can be used only for their own app building.

Conflicts in the same library are not handled well in Maven. Conflicts in the same library are handled well in Ant.

Placeholder content is displayed using skeleton text in ionic 4. Placeholder contents are not displayed in ionic 3.

Popover dialogue controls the overflow actions in ionic 4. Popover dialogue is not available in ionic 3.

Ionic 4 can be rightly called a standalone library of web components. Ionic 3 can be called as the framework coupled with Angular.

Ionic 4 can either work with a framework or without a framework. A framework is considered optional. Ionic 3 works only with a framework. The framework cannot be considered optional.

Ionic CLI tool is developed, which provides helpful commands to developers. JIonic 3 does not have a CLI tool with commands. Angular CLI helps in this regard.

The built-in server is available in ionic 4. Ionic 3 does not have any built-in servers.

Single ion router component is used in ionic 4 that helps in routing the tools. Components are pushed directly for navigation in ionic 3.

Applications are split up into multiple bundles to differentiate between them. Applications are transferred only as a single bundle, so that differentiation is not possible.

Ionic 4 uses an Angular style guide for file structure. Ionic 3 has its own file structure and style.


Migration from ionic 3 is easy as it is done by creating new applications and installing dependencies. Ionic 4 uses Stencil for code refactoring. The ionic framework is open source and can be used by anyone. Every new version is developed with new enhancements in the framework.

Recommended Articles

This is a guide to Ionic 4 vs Ionic 3. Here we discuss Ionic 4 vs Ionic 3 key differences with infographics and comparison table. You can also go through our other suggested articles to learn more–

You're reading Ionic 4 Vs Ionic 3

Microsoft Surface 3 Vs Google Nexus 9

Our Verdict

The Nexus 9 is the cheaper option here and will suit those who a tablet for enjoyment but also need to do the occasional bit of light work. However, the Surface 3 is the better package for working with a more suitable design comprised of the kickstand and Type Cover. A larger screen, more storage and useful ports are all big benefits.

Microsoft’s Surface 3 has arrived as a cheaper alternative to the Surface Pro 3, but how does it compare to the Google Nexus 9 which also has a keyboard dock? Find out in our Surface 3 vs Nexus 9 comparison review. Also see: Best new tablets coming in 2023.

The Nexus 9 and Surface 3 are quite different tablets but both offer a very similar set-up for getting work done when you include their respective keyboard docks. See what we make of each one including price, design, hardware and software.

Surface 3 vs Nexus 9: Price

As usual price is an important element when buying a new gadget. It’s of little surprise that the Google Nexus 9 is the cheaper option starting at £319. The Surface 3 will set you back at least £100 more depending on what model you choose. We’ve outlined the various choices in the table below.

Chances are, you’re reading this article as the Surface 3 and Nexus 9 are two tablets on the market which are potentially good for doing work on, although they are very different. The reason is that they both have keyboard dock accessories which make them more like a laptop in use. However, it’s worth pointing out that neither price includes the extra.

The Surface 3 Type Cover (available in various colours) will set you back £109 while the Nexus 9 Keyboard Folio case is effectively the same at £110 so bear this in mind when making your decision. See also: best budget laptops you can buy in 2023

Nexus 9

Surface 3







64GB + 4G LTE




128GB + 4G LTE


Surface 3 vs Nexus 9: Design – using like a laptop    

The Nexus 9 and Surface 3 look quite different – Google’s tablet is thinner and ligher at 7.95mm and 425g compared to 8.7mm and 622g – but we’re mainly interested in the aspect of using them for work. At lot of this comes down to the keyboard, although there’s also the optional pen for sketching and writing on the Surface. It costs £45 but could come in extremely handy depending on the task you’re doing. It’s far more accurate than using your finger and the physical button can be used to launch OneNote and take screenshots.

Microsoft’s Surface 3 Type Cover is by far the simpler solution and snaps on and off quickly with magnets – it just works. You use it completely flat or use the magnets to give it a nice angle like a regular keyboard. It’s worth noting that the kickstand built into the tablet itself offers three different viewing angles whether the Type Cover is attached or not.

A couple of features which it has over the Nexus 9 are the backlit keys and a built-in trackpad. When the cover is closed it protects the screen of the Surface 3.

As the name suggests, the Nexus 9 Keyboard Folio is a full case for the tablet – although it also attaches magnetically. As you don’t need an additional case as you might do for the Surface 3, the Nexus 9 could be be a cheaper option.

The keyboard must sit flat, and there are only two viewing angles for the screen and no backlit keys or a trackpad. Since there’s no physical connection between the case and the tablet, you must pair the two using Bluetooth. This isn’t the end of the world but the Surface method simpler and easier. It also means you need to keep the Keyboard Folio charged up in order for it to work (Google claims it can last up to five months on a single charge).

Surface 3 vs Nexus 9: Hardware and software

Starting with the screen, which is pretty important when you’re trying to get work done. The Nexus 9 is smaller at 8.9in but has a higher resolution at 2048×1536. The Surface 3 is 10.8in and Full HD Plus 1920×1280. Resolution aside, the size is more important when it comes to getting things done so the extra space on the Surface could make a big difference depending on your task. That said, we still prefer the Surface Pro 3 with its 12.1in display over the noticeably smaller 10.8in display.

Storage is also going to be a potentially big deal and it makes sense that the cheaper Nexus 9 has less available with just 16- or 32GB. Opt for the pricier Surface 3 and you’ll get at least 64GB or 128GB if you don’t mind paying more but there’s also a microSD card slot which Google doesn’t offer.

In the engine room, each tablet has 2GB of RAM (4GB on the 128GB Surface 3) and the Nexus 9 is powered by a 64-bit nVidia Tegra K1 Dual Denver processor clocked at 2.3GHz. The Surface 3 has the new Intel Atom x7 which is 1.6GHz but can jump to 2.4Gz with Intel Burst technology. Microsoft’s tablet is the more competent here although it has its limits and we wouldn’t recommend it for video editing.

Like most Android tablets, the Nexus 9 doesn’t provide any physical ports beyond microUSB, but it does have NFC should that come in useful. Microsoft has also switched to microUSB for charging but it offers full-size USB 3.0 and Mini DisplayPort on top, making the Surface 3 much more like a proper laptop.

Battery life is similar here with up to 10 hour video playback on the Surface 3 and 9.5 hour on the Nexus 9 so software is a bigger deal.

While the Nexus 9 comes with stock Android 5.0 Lollipop, the Surface comes pre-installed with Windows 8.1 (the full version, not RT which is now defunct) and will  be upgraded to Windows 10 later this year for free. This is a huge difference and although many apps, including Office, are available for Android, the Surface 3 give you more scope for running software.

Reasons to buy the Nexus 9: Cheaper, better for fun alongside work, lighter and more compact.

Reasons to buy the Surface 3: Designed for work, better keyboard dock, larger screen, more ports, expandable storage.

Specs Microsoft Surface 3: Specs

Windows 8.1 Intel Atom x7-Z8700 processor, quad-core 1.6GHz (turbo to 2.4GHz) Up to 4GB DDR3 RAM Up to 128GB internal storage 10.8in ClearType full-HD-plus (1920×1280, 214ppi, 3:2) multitouch display USB 3.0 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi Bluetooth 4.0 Mini DisplayPort 8Mp rear camera 3.5Mp front camera Stereo speakers with Dolby sound battery life up to 10 hours (video playback) 267x187x8.7mm 622g (without keyboard) 1 year warranty

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Vs Galaxy Z Flip 3: Camera Shootout

Eric Zeman / Android Authority

In our reviews, we’ve already established that neither the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 nor the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is the world’s best camera phone. With primarily 12MP shooters, Samsung’s foldables take average shots but don’t necessarily compare to the top camera phones in the market, such as the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra and its 108MP sensor. But how do the Z Fold 3 and Z Flip 3 cameras fare when pitted directly against one another?

With samples in tow, we decided to compare these two phones head-to-head in a Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Galaxy Z Flip 3 camera shootout to see if there’s a clear winner.

Related: The best foldable phones you can get

Like the main cameras, the selfie cameras are almost the same. The Z Fold 3 has a 10MP selfie camera at f/2.2 with 1.22μm pixels and the Z Flip 3 has a 10MP selfie camera at f/2.4 with 1.22μm pixels. Only the aperture separates them. The Z Fold 3 adds a 4MP under-display camera at f/1.8 that hides beneath the pixels of the main inner display.

In this second daytime image, we have more green and grays thanks to the church. The greens of the shot from the Z Fold 3 are plainly pushed more than those from the Z Flip 3. Both images demonstrate solid exposure and balance — and noise. There’s plenty of distracting noise in the leaves of the trees. Overall, the Z Fold 3’s shot is a little richer and more pleasing to the eye.

See also: How to use manual mode on your smartphone camera

Samsung is known across the industry for boosting colors.

In these color samples, you can see bright, pushed colors from both phones. Samsung is known across the industry for boosting colors and it’s obvious here. I’m seeing identical color, exposure, and white balance, though the sample from the Z Flip 3 is a bit sharper. The colors are not quite accurate to the way they are in real life, but they look so good it’s easy to forgive Samsung for the tweaking. It’s too close to call an overall winner.

In this dusky shot taken of a waterfall from under a bridge, we’ve got a lot going on. The HDR is working overtime to pull out the details in those bricks on the left side of the image. I like that the greens are richer in the shots from the Z Fold 3, but the Z Flip 3 does a slightly better job balancing out the sky and the land together. The Z Fold 3 blew out the sky just a little bit when compared to the Z Flip 3. Here, I don’t think there’s an obvious winner.

More reading: The best triple camera phones available

Reading the text lets us really examine the detail available in this pair of images. The text is equally legible in both samples, despite the slight difference in magnification between the two. Even so, the smaller text taken by the Z Fold 3 is just a wee bit sharper and cleaner due to some noise introduced by the Z Flip 3. The carving itself looks just as good in both photos, and the exposure and color is on par between them. There’s no obvious winner here.

Here, we’re looking at photos taken from each phone’s ultra-wide-angle cameras. Of all the shots in this collection, these two are the most similar. Each has the same strengths and weaknesses. For example, the colors and dynamic range are solid, while the small building in both photos loses detail due to slight overexposure. Given that the Z Fold 3 and Z Flip 3 share the exact same ultra-wide-angle camera, it’s no surprise that the photos are nearly identical.

Here we have a look at how the Z Fold 3 and Z Flip 3 capture portraits. Beyond the obvious difference in magnification, both phones do an admirable job here. Washington’s head is captured in sharp detail, with good edge detection and pleasant background blur. Exposure looks a little bit better from the Z Flip 3, as the Z Fold 3 overexposed Washington’s face just a little bit, which caused a small loss of detail. Most importantly, the portraits aren’t overly noisy and don’t look forced.

See also: The best Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 cases you can get

Here are some selfie samples from the Z Fold 3 and Z Flip 3. Each of these is a 10MP shot, the Z Fold 3 with the outer cover camera and the Z Flip 3 with the inner punch hole camera. They are fine selfies, but not the best I’ve seen. There’s a lot of noise from both images, particularly in the background. That said, exposure, color, and sharpness are all on par between the two. It’s nearly impossible to tell them apart.

There’s a clear winner between these two low-light shots. I like the way both photos show shadows from the floodlights on the buildings. The Z Fold 3 snagged a cleaner photo all around that’s sharper, more nuanced, and less washed out by the ambient light sources. The Z Fold 3 also managed to produce better colors despite the lack of light.

Related: The best Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 cases you can get

Neither of these night images is particularly compelling, but again there’s a clear winner. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 3 was able to pull far more detail out of the dark background using the night mode tool. The image from the Z Flip 3 shows hardly any detail in the trees at all, and its muted colors can’t compare to those produced by the Z Fold 3. Samsung’s pricier foldable notches the win here.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Z Flip 3 camera shootout: The verdict

Eric Zeman / Android Authority

Given the near-identical hardware shared between these two phones, I expected the results of this Z Fold 3 vs Z Flip 3 to be even closer than they are. The majority of the images above are close to dead even, with only minutia separating them. If there’s one trend I spotted, it was consistently better color in shots taken with the Z Fold 3. The color wasn’t dramatically better, but it was generally more pleasant to look at when compared to the shots from the Z Flip 3. Other than that and low light performance, however, little differentiates the photos.

Samsung Galaxy S10 Vs Galaxy S9: 4 Reasons To Upgrade

As we’ve come to expect from Samsung flagships, the Galaxy S10 comes with a gorgeous design and top of the line specifications. Not only is the device available in three different models, but also you can get each model in different storage options. The standard variant, dubbed Galaxy S10, has a 6.1-inch Quad HD+ curved AMOLED display, 8GB RAM, 3400mAh battery, triple rear cameras (12MP+12MP+16MP) and is available in 128GB and 512GB storage options.

The most expensive variant of the three, aptly named Galaxy S10+, comes with a larger 6.4-inch Quad HD+ curved AMOLED display, 8/12GB RAM, 4100mAh battery, and there are three storage alternatives to choose from, which include 128GB, 512GB, and 1TB (that’s more storage than my MacBook and phone combined!). The rear camera setup on this one is the same as the standard variant, though. The cheapest of the three, somewhat nonsensically named Galaxy S10e, is no inferior by any means. For a relatively lower price tag, the ‘e’ variant offers you a 5.8-inch FullHD+ AMOLED display, 6/8GB RAM, 3100mAh battery, dual rear cameras (12MP+16MP) and 128/256GB storage.

Those differences aside, all three of the models are powered by Qualcomm’s latest and best chipset of this year, Snapdragon 855, and each of them features a MicroSD slot to expand storage up to 1TB. For taking selfies, they’re equipped with a 10MP camera on the front with an aperture of f/1.9. The Plus variant, however, has an additional 8MP front-facing sensor for the depth.

Now that we have got the specs out of the way, let’s get to the point:

Why should you upgrade from Galaxy S9 to Galaxy S10 The new innovative design gets my vote

As the name suggests, the new design from the Korean tech giant has the front-facing camera incorporated on the display, thus giving the device a more streamlined aesthetics and, most importantly, providing users with increased screen real estate.

Gizchina News of the week

Join GizChina on Telegram

Last year, many fans took it to Reddit to share how annoyed they were with Samsung not releasing a flat-edged Galaxy S9. The firm addressed the concern this time around with the launch of a less-gimmicky Galaxy S10e.

Additionally, the Galaxy S10 comes with a fancy in-display fingerprint scanner instead of the traditional capacitive fingerprint reader we’ve grown accustomed to from the previous Samsung handsets. Although it does not warrant an upgrade, the in-display scanner is still a neat feature to have especially considering it is as fast as the traditional capacitive one.

Unrivalled performance

Samsung promises a boost of 29% in terms of CPU performance and 37% when it comes to GPU performance compared to last year’s counterparts, and the GeekBench 4 multi-core scores pretty much echo the same:

Samsung Galaxy S9 – 8,302 points

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus – 8,416 points

Samsung Galaxy S10e – 10,513 points

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus – 10,732 points

Reverse wireless charging

Yet another good reason to upgrade to a Galaxy S10 smartphone is the addition of a new feature called Wireless PowerShare. As the name suggests, the feature lets your Galaxy S10 phone act as a wireless charging source to power up your other devices like Samsung’s Galaxy Buds, Galaxy Watch, or pretty much any other Qi-enabled devices including another smartphone.

The feature especially comes in handy when you’re out on the road and your dearly priced Airpods gives up on you with a low battery warning.

Galaxy S10 5G if you’re into future-proofing

5G is the next big thing in wireless technologies and network providers across the world are working around the clock to make a large-scale deployment possible by 2023. For the sake of future-proofing against the imminent arrival of 5G network, Samsung is offering a 5G variant of the Galaxy S10 because obviously, you don’t want to spend a thousand dollars on a technology that is going to be outdated in less than a year.

There’s a Galaxy S10 for everyone

If you don’t want to spend an arm and a leg on a new phone, then I’d suggest you go for the Galaxy S10e that currently starts from $750 for the 128GB version. Meanwhile, if you don’t have any budget constraints, feel free to check out the Galaxy S10 or the S10 Plus that are available from $900 and $1000 onwards. That said, it’s always good to save some bucks whenever you can. So, if your Galaxy S9 is gonna be locked up in a shelf till eternity after you upgrade, it’s probably a good idea to trade in the old pal for some sweet dollar notes — you can get as high as $259 according to SellCell, a price comparison site that promises to give the best prices for your old gadgets.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro Vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Comparison

Our Verdict

With a price some £120 lower than the Galaxy Note 4, dual-SIM capability and the faster hardware of the pair, Xiaomi’s Mi Note Pro is a seriously impressive proposition. But Samsung has plenty to fight back with, including what we think will be the better screen, longer battery life and special features such as an S Pen, a fingerprint scanner, heart-rate monitor and UV sensor. We can’t wait to get the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro into our lab and take a proper look.

Last week Xiaomi unveiled its Mi Note Pro, a much cheaper rival to the Note 4 that it says is the most powerful phone in the world. We take a look at the specs in our Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison. Also see our full Samsung Galaxy Note 4 review. 

Note that we have not yet tested the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro and are merely comparing only the specs; your eventual purchasing decision should also take into account how the phones cope with everyday life. Also see: Best smartphones 2023 and Best Android phones 2023. 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: UK price and availability

Samsung’s Galaxy Note 4 is already available in the UK on a contract or SIM-free. At the time of writing the Note 4 cost £519 SIM-free at Amazon. 

Xiaomi’s Mi Note Pro is not yet on sale in the UK, but it’s expected at the end of March with a retail value of 3,299 yuan. A straight conversion is £353, making it some £160 cheaper than the Note 4, although it’ll probably cost a little more over here. Oppomart is already listing the Mi Note Pro for $599, which equates to £399 (still £120 cheaper than the Note 4). 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: Display, design and build

Both the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro and Samsung Galaxy Note 4 are what we might consider phablets (also see Best phablets 2023) with 5.7in screens. Each adorns a Quad HD (2560×1440) resolution, resulting in a pixel density of 515ppi. The choice of panel tech differs, however, with Samsung using a Super AMOLED screen and Xiaomi opting for Sharp/JDI’s IPS LCD tech. We reckon this gives Samsung the slight edge, but both are brilliant screens. 

The phones are built around sturdy metal frames. Xiaomi fits its Mi Note Pro with a 2.5D glass front and 3D glass rear giving it a premium feel. Samsung matches its front but uses a faux leather rear that may add some grip. The Samsung’s back cover is also removable, letting you access the battery compartment and swap in a spare. 

The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is significantly thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note 4, and a little lighter too. It measures 77.6×6.95×155.1mm and weighs 161g against the Note 4’s 153.5×8.5×78.6mm and 176g. 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: Processor, memory and storage

Xiaomi takes the lead in the hardware department, and although we’ve yet to run our benchmarks on the Mi Note Pro we can be pretty sure its Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 chip will beat the Note 4’s 805 hands-down. Clocked at 2GHz, this 64-bit octa-core processor is paired with Adreno 430 graphics and 4GB of RAM. By comparison the Note 4 packs a 2.7GHz quad-core 32-bit chip with Adreno 420 graphics and 3GB of RAM.  

You might not notice the extra complement of RAM in general use, but Adreno 430 graphics are said to be 30 percent faster than the 420, and the 64-bit support of the Xiaomi’s 810 will allow it to support future 64-bit apps. 

We have had the opportunity to test the Samsung Galaxy Note 4, and found it one of the fastest phones we’ve ever reviewed (also see: What’s the fastest smartphone 2023). In Geekbench 3 it managed 3272 points, in SunSpider it recorded 1367ms, and in GFXBench we saw 27fps in T-Rex and 11fps in Manhattan. Expect even more from the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. 

In terms of storage the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has 64GB as standard (the Note 4 has 32GB), but it lacks the Samsung’s microSD support, which lets you add up to 128GB. 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: Connectivity and extras

The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 stands out for its S Pen (stylus) support and features such as a fingerprint scanner, UV sensor and heart rate monitor, Xiaomi has an ace up its sleeve with dual-SIM support, which is becoming increasingly popular (also see: Best dual-SIM smartphones 2023). The Mi Note Pro accepts a nano- and a Micro-SIM, and both support 4G connectivity.  

The Note 4 also supports 4G, but has only a single SIM option. It’s also of the Cat 6 (300Mb/s) variety, compared to the Mi Note Pro’s Cat 9 (450Mb/s). The Note 4 can, however, pair its 4G connection with Wi-Fi to provide super-fast download speeds. 

According to GSMArena you’ll find Bluetooth 4.0 and dual-band ac Wi-Fi in the Mi Note Pro, but other connectivity specs are to be confirmed. Meanwhile, with the Note 4 you will find an IR blaster, Bluetooth 4.1, NFC, the latest 802.11ac Wi-Fi with 2×2 MIMO, plus MHL 3.0.  

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: Cameras

It’s impossible to say which is the better camera without testing them, although on paper the Samsung appears to have the better rear camera, while the Xiaomi beats it for selfies at the front. Also see: Best selfie smartphones 2023. 

Samsung fits a 16Mp camera at the back, while Xiaomi specifies 13Mp. Both feature OIS, but only the Samsung can shoot 4K video (the Mi Note Pro maxes out at 1080p full-HD). 

At the front the Note 4 has a 3.7Mp camera with a wide selfie mode, while the Mi Note Pro has a 4Mp camera with large 2-micron pixels. 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: Software

Out of the box the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 runs Android 4.4 KitKat with TouchWiz, but it will be updated to the latest version, Android 5.0 Lollipop. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro runs Xiaomi’s MIU 6 software, which is based on Android 4.4.4 KitKat. 

Samsung offers more in terms of extra software features, but this isn’t necessarily a good thing for all users. We do like the ability to simultaneously view two apps onscreen and the S Note app when used with the improved, however. 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4: Audio

Samsung boasts multi-directional voice recording for its Galaxy Note 4 with three mics, but for playback it’s the Xiaomi that takes the lead. It supports 24-bit/192KHz lossless playback of files including APE, FLAC, DSD and WAV. The Note 4 can handle MP3, AAC/AAC?/eAAC?, WMA, AMR-NB/WB, Vorbis and FLAC audio. 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: Battery life

Battery life is impossible to guess from the specs alone, but we reckon this one will swing Samsung’s way. Not only does it have less powerful hardware and more energy-efficient screen tech, its battery is higher-capacity (3220mAh against the Xiaomi’s 3000mAh) and removable. Also see: Best power banks 2023. 

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comparison: Verdict

With a price some £120 lower than the Galaxy Note 4, dual-SIM capability and the faster hardware of the pair, Xiaomi’s Mi Note Pro is a seriously impressive proposition. But Samsung has plenty to fight back with, including what we think will be the better screen, longer battery life and special features such as an S Pen, a fingerprint scanner, heart-rate monitor and UV sensor. We can’t wait to get the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro into our lab and take a proper look. 

Follow Marie Brewis on Twitter. 

Specs Samsung Galaxy Note 4: Specs

Android 4.4.4 KitKat OS

5.7in SuperAMOLED display (1440×2560), 515 ppi

2.7GHz Quad-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 CPU

Adreno 420 GPU


32GB internal storage

16Mp rear camera laser AF with optical image stabilistaion

3.7Mp front camera

Video recording at up to 4K

Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac

Bluetooth 4.1 LE



Fingerprint scanner

Heart rate monitor

UV sensor


4G LTE (Cat 6)


11.9Wh (3220mAh) battery



Asus Zenfone 3 Vs Xiaomi Mi 5 Full Comparison Review

We pit the newly launched Zenfone 3 against the slightly older Xiaomi Mi 5 to find out which phone is better in the sub-20k price range.

Asus Zenfone 3 vs Xiaomi Mi 5 Specifications Design & Build

The Asus Zenfone 3 comes with a full metal design with glass covering it on the front and the back. Asus is using Gorilla Glass 3, but it’s still a pretty strong glass so you may not have to worry about protection. While previous Zenfones weren’t as good to look at, the Zenfone 3 has seen a lot of refinement in the design. For a mid-range phone, it looks really good.

The Xiaomi Mi 5 also continues to follow the same trend of a metal frame with glass covering the front and the back. However, in this area, the Mi 5 is better than the Zenfone 3 since it uses Gorilla Glass 4. Additionally, it comes with a much more minimalist design. That gives it extra points in this category.


The Asus Zenfone 3 comes with a 5.2 inch / 5.5 inch Super IPS+ LCD display with full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels) resolution. It comes with a pixel density of ~424 PPI / ~401 PPI. In terms of protection, the device comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 3. In our time with the device today, we found the display to be very good in terms of colour reproduction and sunlight visibility.

The Xiaomi Mi 5 comes with a 5.2 inch IPS LCD display with full HD (1920x1080p) resolution. It comes with a pixel density of ~424 PPI. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 4. Given that this is a flagship smartphone from Xiaomi, the company has made sure the display is a proper, flagship-level quality one. The colour reproduction is just about right and the brightness is very good as well.

To sum it up, display quality is hardly a concern these days. Both the Zenfone 3 and the Mi 5 come with high quality 5.2/5.5 inch full HD displays with good brightness and colour reproduction.

Hardware and Storage

The Xiaomi Mi 5 is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor coupled with Adreno 530. The Xiaomi Mi 5 comes with 3 GB RAM and 32 GB of internal storage. The Mi 5 does not support microSD expansion.

There’s a massive difference between the two phones when it comes to the processor. The Snapdragon 625 is a new 64-bit processor built on the 20nm process, but it’s a dedicatedly mid-range SoC. There is simply no comparison with the Mi 5 which comes with the current Qualcomm flagship SoC, the Snapdragon 820. In this area, the Mi 5 wins hands down.


The Zenfone 3 comes with a 16 MP f/2.0 camera with Laser and Phase Detection Autofocus, with Optical Image Stabilization and dual LED flash for assistance in low light conditions. The phone supports video recording up to 1080p at 30 FPS.

The Mi 5 comes with a 16 MP primary camera with f/2.0 aperture, Phase Detection Autofocus and dual LED flash. Just like the Zenfone 3, it comes with OIS support as well. On the front, you get a 4 MP camera with an aperture of f/2.0 and 2µm pixel size. Even though the resolution is lower than the Zenfone 3’s front camera, it should actually help you to capture better selfies because of the higher pixel size.


The Zenfone 3 and the Mi 5 both come with a 3000 mAh battery and a USB Type C reversible connector. While the Zenfone 3 does support charging up to 2A, Asus has not listed Fast Charging in the specs of the phone. The Mi 5 supports Quick Charge 3.0.

However, given that both the phones come with significantly different processors, the actual battery life remains to be seen.

Pricing & Availability

The Mi 5 is available for Rs. 24,999 and it is available in three colours – White, Black and Gold.


Both the Zenfone 3 and Mi 5 offer good value for money. However, while the Zenfone 3 is a decidedly mid-range phone, the Mi 5 is more of a high-end phone at mid-range prices. Snapdragon 820 processor in the Mi 5 tilts the balance heavily in favour of the phone compared to the Zenfone 3. Other specs like the display, cameras and battery are almost the same, with the Zenfone 3 beating the Mi 5 in terms of RAM and storage.

In simpler words, the Mi 5 is a much better deal overall compared to the Zenfone 3.

Update the detailed information about Ionic 4 Vs Ionic 3 on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!