Trending February 2024 # Intel Slashes Arc A750 To $249, Touts Substantial Gaming Improvements # Suggested March 2024 # Top 10 Popular

You are reading the article Intel Slashes Arc A750 To $249, Touts Substantial Gaming Improvements updated in February 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Intel Slashes Arc A750 To $249, Touts Substantial Gaming Improvements

If you’re a regular PCWorld reader, that shouldn’t come as a surprise. Intel’s first consumer GPUs launched with bugs and rough edges galore, so we’ve been periodically reevaluating Arc’s performance in a monthly video series. Intel’s drivers are already much more stable than before, and the company recently released new drivers that dramatically improve the raw speed and overall smoothness in DirectX 9 games like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and League of Legends.

“Across low- and high-end graphics settings, we’re seeing a 2x increase in frame rates,” we said after testing a handful of titles. Intel says DX9 games now run an average of 43 percent faster than on Arc’s launch driver, and 60 percent smoother. Yes, please.

The focus hasn’t all been on older games though. Coinciding with today’s Arc A750 price drop, Intel is launching another new driver with improvements across a variety of DirectX 11 and 12 games, including a massive 57 percent uplift in Warframe (DX11) performance. That’s vital; our Arc A770 and A750 review showed Intel’s GPU often besting Nvidia’s popular RTX 3060 in ray tracing and DX12 games, but optimizing DX11 titles requires a lot more work from the GPU drivers, and Arc can suffer hard there. Intel hasn’t been shy about saying this will require long-term focus from the team, and they’re clearly putting that work in.

Intel has pushed out eight “Game On” drivers since launch, with optimizations for 21 games, and 35 titles have pledged support for XeSS—Intel’s DLSS rival.

Speaking of Nvidia and the RTX 3060, it’s still selling for wildly inflated pricing on the streets, and Intel is seizing onto that fact to drive home the value of the newly $249 Arc A750, as per the complex, but striking chart below. It shows the average 1080p frames per second per dollar for the A750, normalized to the RTX 3060’s average FPS per dollar as the baseline in each game. So in games where the blue bars are higher than the green bar, the Arc A750 is a better value per dollar (and vice-versa).

Intel Arc A750 vs. AMD Radeon RX 6600

Ignore the highly priced RTX 3060 though. For gamers, the bottom line here is that the Arc A750 is now $249, and Intel’s drivers and stability have been rapidly improving. After years of wandering the GPU wasteland, we now have two graphics cards available new for $250 or less. So should you buy the Intel Arc A750 or AMD’s rival Radeon RX 6600?

Arc’s main rival

Radeon RX 6600 Swft 210

Read our review

Best Prices Today:

We’d still recommend the Radeon GPU for most people. While many new triple-A games run on DirectX 12, most PC games still run DX11, and AMD’s DX11 support just works at full speed. The Radeon RX 6600 also runs well in any computer, while the Arc A750 needs a fairly modern system with PCIe Resizable Bar active or its frame rates plummet.

That said, now that Intel upped DX9 performance so heavily and put intense effort into driver stability, the Arc A750 seems fairly compelling, especially for under $250. Its DX12 and ray tracing performance blows past even the much more expensive RTX 3060 in many games, and now, its handling of games running older DirectX versions is much better than before. Even if the Arc A750 can’t match the Radeon RX 6600 in raw DX11 performance, it still delivers a wholly playable experience there, and all the specific driver bugs mentioned in my Intel Arc launch review have been fixed.

If you tend to play new, big budget blockbuster games or want to poke around with ray tracing without breaking the bank, the newly $249 Intel Arc A750 may very well be worth considering. Mainstream gamers have actual options now! Yay competition.


Excellent performance in DX12/Vulkan games

Best-in-class raw ray-tracing performance

Intel’s Limited Edition cooler design is cool, quiet, and attractive

AV1 encoding



Requires PCIe Resizable BAR for good performance

Lagging performance in DX11 games

XeSS works well, but only in a handful of games

Some rough edges in software

Our Verdict

The Arc A750 Limited Edition is a graphics card that offers great value and exceptional performance in ray tracing and DX12 games, but there are many caveats to consider before buying it.

You're reading Intel Slashes Arc A750 To $249, Touts Substantial Gaming Improvements

Intel: Nehalem “Frees Up Resources”

SANTA CLARA, Calif. — Moving to a new server architecture isn’t easy. Heck, Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) says the chip development behind its new “Nehalem” design alone was a four-year process. But now it’s pitching servers based on its Xeon 5500 as a no-brainer IT purchase despite the rough economy and tight budgets.

“Literally, after eight months, it becomes a cash machine for IT that frees up resources to focus on innovation,” said Pat Gelsinger, senior vice president and general manage of Intel’s Digital Enterprise Group, at the Nehalem launch event here at Intel headquarters yesterday.

Well, maybe. Gelsinger was basing his remarks on the idea that an IT department would replace or consolidate its older single and dual-core servers with new ones based on quad-core Nehalem (Xeon 5500) processors.

Certainly, there is no lack of equipment ripe for upgrading in most datacenters: IDC estimates about 40 percent of the installed based of Intel servers run on single-core processors, while another 40 percent on dual-core. And that’s where the projected savings comes in.

“You can consolidate nine single core Xeons onto on single 5500 machine,” Gelsinger said — a move that reduces cooling, power and real estate considerations.

But the eight-month payback he described from such a move doesn’t begin when the box arrives with your shiny new servers. For one thing, there are testing and deployment issues to consider.

Intel said it’s already shipped over 200,000 Nehalem processors, which can be found in systems from the likes of Cisco, Dell, HP, IBM, and Sun. At the launch event, IT executives from five blue-chip companies said they are still evaluating Nehalem servers and blade systems, though they were uniformly enthusiastic about eventual deployment.

“Clearly, the payback Intel is talking about is based on lower operating costs in terms of things like power and cooling and even lower software licensing costs,” Nathan Brookwood, research fellow at Insight64, told chúng tôi “But you have to make the investment first to evaluate and deploy.”

“Right now, these companies are enthusiastic, but they’re still kicking the tires,” he added. “This is a more complex process than just upgrading a processor for them — it’s a whole new system.”

In other words, that theoretical eight-month cash-out clock doesn’t start ticking until the systems are deployed and doing real-world work. “What Intel is saying is if you put these Nehalem servers in, you will eventually save a lot of money compared to doing nothing and staying with what you already have installed,” Brookwood said.

IDC analyst Jean Bozman said the new Nehalem-based systems offer both compelling performance and energy savings, but that doesn’t mean every business is going to run out to buy them.

“When times are tough, some companies simply aren’t going to buy anything at all and just stick with what they have,” Bozman said. “Demands on the infrastructure would be one reason where companies are going to more motivated to buy.”

That’s exactly the issue facing Humana. The health care provider has over 10 million customers and the amount of data it has to process has increased ten times over the past three years. In the process, its infrastructure had hit the wall: Paul Ratner, Humana’s vice president of IT operations, said during a panel discussion that at least one of its datacenters had run out of square footage to house servers, “and we ran out of energy.

To cope, a new datacenter in the works will leverage Nehalem-based blade servers, he said, indicating that blades would grow from 3 percent to 42 percent of Humana’s servers, “which is going to reduce the physical footprint by half [and] require a lot less electricity and cooling.”

Shrinking the datacenter’s footprint

Online auction giant eBay (NASDAQ: EBAY) was another big customer at the Nehalem launch. Over a million people run a business on eBay, according to Mazen Rawashdeh, the company’s senior director of operations infrastructure and site capacity.

Mazen also said his goal is savings of between 30 to 40 percent on energy, and early testing indicates the new Nehalem servers will deliver just that.

And what about the next round of upgrades when even this current round of super servers start to show their age?

Gelsinger claimed such a move won’t be nearly as disruptive. What Intel and its partners showed Monday “is future proof,” he said.

“Coming next is our six-core Westmere processor based on 32-nanometer technology that will drop directly into the existing systems as a replacement.”

This article was first published on chúng tôi

How To Start A Gaming Blog

A gaming blog is a website that typically publishes video game guides, news, and reviews.

If you’re looking to make a gaming blog, you don’t have to code.

Instead, you can use a CMS (content management system) like WordPress (.org).

WordPress is used by over 40% of all websites on the internet, and it’s the gold standard for website creation.

This quick and easy guide teaches you how to start a gaming blog (video game) in a few hours of work and with minimal expenses.

Just so that you know you’re in good hands—I’m the founder of this website (that’s also built on WordPress).

I have multiple years of experience in SEO, blogging (writing video game guides), and website creation.

Here is how to start a gaming blog in 7 easy steps:

1. Get web hosting

To get your gaming blog up and running, you need to get web hosting.

SiteGround hosting is highly recommended because it’s fast, secure, and reliable.

Choose between 3 plans—StartUp, GrowBig (recommended), or GoGeek.

2. Choose a domain name for your gaming blog

Other extensions like .org, .net, or .io, are fine too, but they are not the most common.

Review the order and pay using a debit/credit card.

3. Install WordPress

Select “Set Up Website” to start the installation process.

Select “Start New Website” and select “WordPress”.

Choose if you want to add extra services.

Select “Finish” and wait for WordPress to install.

Tip: If you need help with the installation process, you can contact SiteGround’s 24/7 support for help.

4. Choose a theme

Once WordPress is finished installing, you need to choose a theme (the design of your blog).

For a Gaming blog, I recommend buying a premium theme like GeneratePress, Divi, or Astra.

Tip #1: You can find great WordPress themes on EnvatoMarket.

Tip #2: If you need help with customizing your theme, you can contact your theme’s support.

Tip #3: You can create a gaming logo for free using Namecheap’s logo maker (it’s the best logo maker that I’ve used).

5. Install plugins

Recommended plugins to install:

Google Site Kit – Easily connect your site to Google Analytics to see real-time visitors and stats.

Yoast SEO – An all-in-one SEO plugin for WordPress that you can use to add an XML sitemap (a site directory).

Jetpack – A security, speed, and stats plugin.

6. Start posting video game content

Since you’re starting a gaming blog, you need to research PC, PS4/PS5, and Xbox games to write about.

You can write about gaming guides (e.g. how to craft a diamond pickaxe in Minecraft), reviews, news, and more.

To find content ideas, you can use the Google Keyword Planner or browse similar blogs (e.g. IGN, GamesRadar, PCGamer).

When writing your post, make sure to include headers, spacing, lists, and media to engage your readers.

You can also add categories and tags to your post on the right sidebar.

Tip #1: If your blog is new, your posts will start ranking on Google after 3 to 6 months (if they are of quality).

Tip #2: Try targeting low-competition keywords like “How to start a video game cafe” instead of “How to start a business”.

7. Monetize your gaming blog

Once your gaming blog gains some traffic, you can start monetizing it.

I recommend applying for Google AdSense or Ezoic.

Before you apply to either one, make sure that your blog has a privacy policy and an “About” page.

You can also join the Amazon Associates program and include video game affiliate links in your articles.

Tip #1: Ezoic earns about 5x more than Google AdSense because of its technology.

Tip #2: After you’ve reached 50k or 100k monthly visitors, you can apply for Mediavine or Adthrive (both are premium ad networks).

Further reading

How to Make a Website Like WikiHow

How to Make a Website Like Wikipedia

How to Make a Website like Twitter (5 Easy Steps)

3 Quick Ways To Install The Intel Watchdog Timer Driver

3 Quick Ways to Install the Intel Watchdog Timer Driver The best three ways to seamlessly install the driver




To restart your app’s failed instances automatically, getting the updated version of the Intel watchdog timer driver is crucial


In this case, do not hesitate to a

ccess the manufacturer’s website, as described below.

Even though more cumbersome, using Device Manager is always an option.

To simplify the process considerably and ensure the correct driver is installed, using specialized software will help immensely.



To fix Windows PC system issues, you will need a dedicated tool

Fortect is a tool that does not simply cleans up your PC, but has a repository with several millions of Windows System files stored in their initial version. When your PC encounters a problem, Fortect will fix it for you, by replacing bad files with fresh versions. To fix your current PC issue, here are the steps you need to take:

Download Fortect and install it on your PC.

Start the tool’s scanning process to look for corrupt files that are the source of your problem

Fortect has been downloaded by


readers this month.

The Intel Watchdog Timer driver allows specific devices to leverage the platform’s hardware. It’s a critical driver that enables the system to perform well. And if you want the get it, we will tell you how to install the Intel watchdog timer driver.

It can also automatically restart the failed instances of your programs, logging the activity for troubleshooting. Therefore, it is essential to install its related driver properly.

Today’s article discusses some valuable recommendations to help you install the Intel watchdog timer driver.

What is a watchdog timer, and what is it used for?

A Watchdog Timer is a timer that identifies the programs that are not responding or have stopped working and alerts the necessary components if things are not automatically fixed within a given time frame.

It’s a critical device that prevents damage to the system and ensures an optimal experience by performing the relevant operation.

Do I need Intel Watchdog Timer driver?

You may notice a slightly higher boot time and, in some cases, a deadlock between the Watchdog Timer and Microcontroller Unit.

How do I install the Intel Watchdog Timer driver?

1. Access the manufacturer’s website


To easily install the driver, do not hesitate to check out this dedicated Intel Watchdog Timer guide by Intel.

2. Use Device Manager

You now know how to manually install the Intel watchdog timer driver and can easily do so from either the manufacturer’s website or the Device Manager.

Expert tip:

3. Use third-party software

You can easily install the Intel watchdog timer driver with the help of dedicated third-party software. Comparing it to the manual methods, this automatic software can save much more of your time.

Also, driver installers allow you to perform actions on a friendly and intuitive interface.

Here’s how to do it:

Download and install the Outbyte Driver Updater app.

Launch the software.

Wait for the app to detect all incompatible drivers.

Afterward, it will show you a list of the drivers found to select the ones to Update or Ignore.

Restart your PC to ensure the applied changes.

Outbyte Driver Updater

Use this software and solve all driver-related issues from your PC.

Free trial Download now

Disclaimer: You may need to upgrade the app from the free version to perform specific actions.

How do I turn on my watchdog timer?

After you have installed the Intel Watchdog Timer Utility, launch it, head to Advanced settings, and then tick the Hardware watchdog checkbox.

Once done, restart the computer for the changes to come into effect. Also, the watchdog timer may be disabled from the BIOS, so you will have to check there as well, the steps for which would be different for all manufacturers and should be available on their official website.

If you were wondering how to install the Intel watchdog timer driver, you would find that we’ve selected the best options by scouring various forums and online blogs.

Ensure you also check some valuable recommendations about updating drivers in Windows 10.

Comment in the section below and let us know which of our suggestions worked best for your Intel watchdog timer driver installation.

Was this page helpful?


Start a conversation

Amd Vs Intel: Which One Is Better?

See also: What’s the best GPU for gaming?

AMD vs Intel — Where they stand

AMD and Intel have a long intertwined history in the semiconductor market. Intel is a Goliath in the space, leading the charge with its CPUs since the IBM era. AMD hopped on the scene fairly early as a licensed manufacturer for Intel and others. It later started making its own chips, offering cheaper alternatives to Intel. AMD’s first big moment came when it introduced the first x86_64 chip in 2003, beating Intel. This 64-bit move pushed AMD forward. It became an Intel alternative with a better price-to-performance in the 2000s.

AMD and Intel have a cross-licensing agreement under which Intel lets AMD make x86 CPUs, and AMD lets Intel use its x86_64 instruction set. AMD has historically been the underdog in this race. It lagged behind Intel by failing to implement a proper equivalent to Hyperthreading, among other architectural improvements. This is why Intel’s lower-end offerings could often beat AMD CPUs with much higher core counts. This was until AMD introduced its Zen architecture in 2023, with the first-gen Ryzen CPUs.

What does AMD offer?


AMD has a relatively lean lineup of CPUs. With the new Zen architecture, its offerings have gotten much more streamlined. There are options available at different prices for consumers, although not as many as Intel offers.

AMD has managed to expand its range of CPUs with the Ryzen lineup. You get four tiers of Ryzen CPUs — Ryzen 3, 5, 7, and 9. You also get the Threadripper series, the beefiest consumer CPU AMD sells. On the lower end are the Athlon processors. AMD also has a solid graphics card lineup under the Radeon brand and server solutions under the EPYC branding.

AMD vs Intel — budget and mid-range CPUs

Kris Carlon / Android Authority

Both Intel and AMD have a solid presence in the budget and mid-range segments. They have head-to-head competitors in the space for the most part, which means that consumers have options between the two. 

AMD A-Series and Athlon vs Intel Pentium and Celeron

Both AMD and Intel have two prominent series in the low-budget market. AMD has the A-Series APUs, which have enjoyed popularity in super affordable systems and come with integrated graphics. The other offering is the Athlon series, which has come from being its former flagship series to powering budget AMD systems.

Intel has two offerings in the space as well. First off is the legendary Pentium series, which was also Intel’s flagship range back in the days. Along with it is the Celeron lineup, which slots slightly lower than Pentium.

There are quite a few models in these ranges, but many of those are OEM-only models that you cannot purchase separately. If you were to pick one, the best AMD pick would be the AMD Athlon 3000G, and the best Intel pick would be the Intel Pentium Gold 6400G. Both offer similar specifications, but the Pentium pulls ahead in a few metrics.

AMD Ryzen 3 vs Intel Core i3

AMD and Intel face off in the budget performance categories with their Ryzen 3 and Core i3 CPUs. However, their strategies are a bit different. While both have offerings that compete well and have a solid value for money, AMD has taken a different approach with its Ryzen 3 lineup.

AMD’s Ryzen 3 lineup has gone OEM-only, which means you can get the newer Ryzen 3 models, i.e., 4000 series and 5000 series models, in pre-built systems only. You cannot purchase these newer Ryzen 3 CPUs to build your own PC. The best AMD Ryzen 3 CPU you can get individually is the Ryzen 3 3300X, which is a couple of generations old.

AMD Ryzen 5 vs Intel Core i5

AMD vs Intel — high-end CPUs

Kris Carlon / Android Authority

Intel and AMD compete in the high-end market on several levels, ranging from high-performance consumer systems to maxed-out core-packed offerings for power users.

AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7

AMD Ryzen 9 vs Intel Core i9

The consumer flagship CPU segment also has tough competition between the two chipmakers. AMD has two solid entrants in the space, with the 5900X with a 12-core, 24-thread design, and the top-of-the-line 5950x with a 16-core 32-thread design. You can get the 5900X for around $400 versus the $570 MSRP, and the 5950X for $550 versus the $800 MSRP.

Intel has retaken the lead with its 12th Gen refresh. The standard model is the i9-12900K, with an eight-core, 16-thread design. The beefiest model is the i9-12900KS at 150W, with the 125W 12900K right behind. You can get the 12900K for around $600, with the 12900KS going for between $750 and $800.

See also: AMD CPU Guide

Intel has a clear lead here, with DDR5 support and performance. Intel still races ahead if you consider the $600 mark and pit the 12900K against the top-of-the-line 5950X. The $50 difference in current pricing is indicative of the performance gap, though, so regardless of which one you buy, you’ll get your money’s worth.

With the laptop offerings, both are on par. Intel has the 12900H and 12900HK, while AMD has the 6900HS, 6900HX, 6980HS, and 6980HX, although we’re yet to see a laptop powered by the last two.

AMD Threadripper vs Intel Core X-Series

AMD vs Intel — Server, networking, and others

AMD doesn’t stretch too far beyond its consumer range, but they have enough enterprise solutions to dent the space. The most notable ones are the AMD EPYC range of server CPUs and AMD Instinct MI series accelerators. AMD also markets some of its consumer-grade-level enterprise solutions under the Pro moniker. Most of them are consumer processor equivalents that go into OEM systems. We expect more diversification now that AMD has acquired Xilinx — a big name in the FPGA and networking business. The AMD vs Intel race is about to get even closer.

If we haven’t noted it enough, Intel is a much bigger company than AMD. Its offerings go far beyond the general consumer CPU market. To begin with, the historically industry-favorite server CPUs are marketed under the Xeon brand. Intel also has Atom, a range formerly made for low-power systems, which now serves on the lower end of its server and networking solutions. Then there is the AI-focused Movidius range, the embedded solutions, the NUCs, and not forgetting its storage and networking solutions.

See also: All of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors explained

AMD vs Intel — How it will go from here and which one you should buy


AMD vs Intel is a fight that is nowhere close to finishing. As we have seen in the past, AMD has a pattern of flip-flopping, where after a stint of industry successes, it loses its way for a few years. On the other hand, Intel has always held the fort and only recently shown weaknesses that align with AMD’s current rise in the market.

Intel has had troubles with its fabrication processes for a few years now, and those troubles seem to be far from over. Even though the 12th Gen offerings are relatively solid, AMD uses a smaller fabrication process. This limits Intel to 10nm, while AMD will continue with the most efficient process they can find.

AMD’s acquisition of Xilinx will also allow it to go beyond its regular offering of consumer CPUs. It will take a long time to get to Intel’s size. However, it doesn’t seem like the colossal impossibility it looked like a few years ago.

As far as your current purchase decisions go, it’s a mixed bag if you can get your hands on it. Intel has taken the lead with the 12th Gen offerings, but AMD is still offering sufficient value with lower prices for the 5000 series processors, although missing DDR5 support. AMD is set to unveil the Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 series of desktop CPUs sometime soon in 2023, which could flip the tide again. For now, pick the Intel 12th Gen CPU or AMD Ryzen 5000 CPU that fits your budget.

Don’t Panic! Intel Says Hertzbleed Cpu Vulnerability Unlikely To Affect Most Users

Hertzbleed is a discovery of several cooperative university security research teams, published as a standalone website before an upcoming security symposium. The general idea is that it’s possible to observe the way modern CPUs dynamically adjust their core frequencies to “see” what they’re computing, allowing a program to theoretically steal cryptographic keys. This “side-channel attack” could be performed without the kind of invasive installed programs usually associated with viruses, ransomware, and other scary stuff. Potentially it could be used to steal everything from encrypted data to passwords to (of freakin’ course) cryptocurrency.

Because it uses the extremely common frequency scaling feature as a method of attack, Hertzbleed is so innocuous and effective that it’s extremely wide-reaching. It potentially affects all modern Intel processors, as well as “several” generations of AMD processors, including desktop and laptops running Zen 2 and Zen 3 chips. Theoretically it might work on more or less any CPU made in the last decade or so.

But should you worry about it? Unless you’re handling some kind of extremely valuable corporate or government data on a regular laptop or desktop, probably not. While Hertzbleed is an ingenious and effective means of stealing access data, it’s not a particularly efficient one. Observing CPU scaling in order to identify and then steal a cryptographic key could take “hours or days” according to Intel, even if the theoretical malware necessary to pull off this kind of attack could replicate the kind of sophisticated power monitoring demonstrated in the paper.

While it’s certainly possible that someone will use Hertzbleed to steal data in the future, the extremely specific targetting and technical prowess required means that the danger is reserved mostly for those who are already targets of sophisticated campaigns of attack. We’re talking government agencies, mega-corportations, and cryptocurrency exchanges, though more everyday employees of these entities might also be at risk for their access credentials.

Between the widely applicable nature of side-channel attack and the complexity required for it to succeed, neither Intel not AMD are issuing patches to address the physical vulnerabilities in their chips. (Patching this kind of extremely basic and universal CPU feature might, in fact, be impossible.) On Intel’s Chips & Salsa blog (get it?), Senior Director of Security Communications Jerry Bryant said, “While this issue is interesting from a research perspective, we do not believe this attack to be practical outside of a lab environment.” The nature of these kinds of attacks, if not this specific method, are already known and accounted for in some high-security environments. Bryant added, “cryptographic implementations that are hardened against power side-channel attacks are not vulnerable to this issue.”

There are a few other ways to mitigate the attack. Disabling Intel’s Turbo Boost or AMD’s Precision Boost effectively turns off frequency scaling, though it also comes with a huge hit to performance. It’s also possible to fool a potential observer by adding randomized adjustments to power scaling, or inserting “artificial noise” to cryptographic sequences. Software makers with a high need for security will undoubtedly be exploring these options in the future.

But the actual danger to the average end-user for the moment is pretty near zero. As a newly-discovered attack vector it’s almost certain that Hertzbleed isn’t being used in the wild yet, and when it does pop up, your average consumer running Windows or MacOS simply won’t be the most effective target.

Update the detailed information about Intel Slashes Arc A750 To $249, Touts Substantial Gaming Improvements on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!