You are reading the article Google’s “Site:” Operator Won’t Show You Everything That’s Indexed updated in March 2024 on the website Achiashop.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested April 2024 Google’s “Site:” Operator Won’t Show You Everything That’s Indexed
Google’s Search Relations team discussed the limited functionality of the “site:” operator on a recent podcast episode.
The team engaged in an insightful discussion on the tool commonly employed by website owners and SEO professionals to check a site’s indexing status.
However, the team emphasized that Google Search Console offers far more in-depth indexing data while the operator provides a high-level overview.Limitations Of ‘Site:’ Operator
The “site:” operator, which allows you to search for pages on a specific website, doesn’t provide a comprehensive list of indexed pages.
Gary Illyes, a Google Search Relations team member, addressed the topic head-on, stating, “No, the site thing shows me some of the pages that are indexed.”
Illyes says it’s not feasible for Google to provide users with an exhaustive list of every indexed page.Use Cases For ‘Site:’ Operator
While the “site:” operator may not serve as an all-encompassing indexing check, the team highlighted several useful purposes for the tool.
It can be leveraged to monitor for unwanted keywords or content, such as “buy Viagra in a Timbuktan casino without a prescription,” as Illyes colorfully demonstrated.
The operator is also helpful for finding localized versions of pages or checking image indexing, which is valuable for websites hosting user-generated content.
“On our search doc site, chúng tôi sometimes I use it to find some of the localized versions of individual pages…” said Illyes.
“Checking for images…like in image search or in the Images tab, you can use that to see what kind of images we have indexed because sometimes that can also get pretty nasty.”
While the discussion was lighthearted at times, the team delivered a sobering final message. Google Search Console is far superior to the “site:” operator for correctly diagnosing and remedying indexing issues.In Summary
A discussion in the latest episode of Search Off The Record examines the capabilities and limitations of the “site:” operator, ensuring an accurate understanding of how and when to employ it.
While it may not be the most accurate way to check a site’s indexing status, its utility in other areas makes it a valuable tool to understand and deploy effectively.
Source: Google Search Off The Record
Featured image generated by the author using Midjourney.
You're reading Google’s “Site:” Operator Won’t Show You Everything That’s Indexed
FIX: Remove Everything recovery option won’t work
Every once in a while, your favorite OS acts out and all sorts of Windows 10 errors lead to severe workflow disruptions.
When the Remove Everything recovery option fails to work properly, you’ll want to take one of the measures here described.
INSTALL BY CLICKING THE DOWNLOAD FILE
To fix Windows PC system issues, you will need a dedicated tool
Fortect is a tool that does not simply cleans up your PC, but has a repository with several millions of Windows System files stored in their initial version. When your PC encounters a problem, Fortect will fix it for you, by replacing bad files with fresh versions. To fix your current PC issue, here are the steps you need to take:
Download Fortect and install it on your PC.
Start the tool’s scanning process to look for corrupt files that are the source of your problem
Fortect has been downloaded by
readers this month.
One of the most common Windows 10 reported issues concerns the Remove Everything recovery option. Namely, something prevents it from restoring your PC from scratch.
How do you delete everything off your computer Windows 10? In case you have a large variety of issues and lack the enthusiasm for the ISO/USB reinstall, the Remove Everything tool comes in handy.
As a short recap, it reinstalls Windows 10 and removes all your personal files, deletes apps and drivers you installed, and removes changes you made to settings. It also removes any apps your PC manufacturer installed.How can I fix the Remove Everything recovery option? 1. Uninstall Office 365
Open Programs and Features.
The main culprit for this issue is, as stated by Microsoft, Office 365. So, your best bet to resolve this issue is to uninstall Office 365 prior to performing any restoring procedures.
Hopefully, once you’ve finished with the restoring process, you can download Office 365 from the official Microsoft site.2. Fire up DISM and SFC Scans
Open the Start menu and type cmd in the search bar.
When prompted by the UAC, hit Yes to open it with administrator privileges.
Dism.exe /online /cleanup-image /restorehealth
The system will commence the verification phase to identify the corrupt files and resolve the issue for you. Do not close the command line window until you see the message verification 100% complete.
Up next, you may restart your PC.
You need to open Command Prompt as an administrator again.
Once the Administrator: Command Prompt window opens, you can run sfc /scannow.
Since it is an extensive scan, it could take some time to complete.
The system will inform you once the procedure has been completed successfully and you may restart your computer.
Don’t know what to do when DISM failed? Check out this quick guide and get rid of the worries.
scannow command has stopped before the process finished? Don’t worry, we’ve got an easy fix for you.
In case you uninstalled Office 365, tried the above tools, and the Remove Everything feature is still malfunctioning, remember this. Fresh updates could be your best bet, so don’t hesitate to look for any new ones.
Having trouble updating your Windows? Check out this detailed guide that will help you solve them in no time.
Users also describe performing a clean Windows 10 install as a working solution. For the complete reinstallation process walkthrough, look here.
Still experiencing issues?
Was this page helpful?
Start a conversation
Google says there are no plans for a Core Web Vitals badge in search results after proposing the idea when the metrics were first introduced.
This is stated by Google’s Search Advocate John Mueller during the Google Search Central SEO office-hours hangout recorded on January 21.
A question was submitted asking for an update on the Core Web Vitals badge and whether it’s something that will be rolled out in the future.
It was never 100% confirmed there would be a Core Web Vitals badge in SERPs, but it was an idea Google mentioned on numerous occasions.
Now it sounds like Google won’t be following through on its idea.
Read Mueller’s full response in the section below.No Plans For A Core Web Vitals Badge In Search Results
Mueller says he can’t promise a CWV badge will never happen, but chances aren’t good.
Since the badge hasn’t rolled out yet, and the idea was first proposed over a year ago, the feeling is that it won’t happen.
“I can’t promise on what will happen in the future, unfortunately. And since we haven’t done this badge so far, and it’s been like over a year, my feeling is probably it will not happen.
I don’t know for certain, and it might be that somewhere a team at Google is making this badge happen and will get upset when I say it, but at least so far I haven’t seen anything happening with regards to a badge like this.
And my feeling is, if we wanted to show a badge in the search results for Core Web Vitals or Page Experience, then probably we would have done that already.”
Muller brings up the fact that Core Web Vitals and Page Experience are always evolving.
The Core Web Vitals metrics, as they are defined today, may include different measurements in the future. It depends what users care about.
“That said, everything around Core Web Vitals and Page Experience is constantly being worked on. And we’re trying to find ways to improve those metrics to include other aspects that might be critical for websites or for users that they care about.
So I wouldn’t be surprised if any of this changes. And it might be that, at some point, we have metrics that are really useful for users, and which make sense to show more to users, and maybe at that point we’ll have something more visible the search results, or within Chrome, or I don’t know. It’s really hard to say there.”
My interpretation of Mueller’s response is that a Core Web Vitals badge in search results isn’t an ideal solution, considering the criteria for earning the badge may change from one year to another.
If the Core Web Vitals were a set of metrics that would remain the same from year to year then a badge might make more sense, but that’s not the case.
Hear Mueller’s response in the video below:
Featured Image: Screenshot from chúng tôi January 2023.
The autonomous car revolution is coming—and in the near future, you’ll most likely ride in one if it is part of a fleet of cars operated by a company. Already, Uber offers trips in self-driving cars throughout Pittsburgh and Phoenix, and Lyft has teamed up with firms like chúng tôi and nuTonomy to focus on autonomous vehicles. Meanwhile, Fiat Chrysler recently announced it would provide “thousands” of minivans to Waymo as part of a “driverless ride-hailing service.” Cruise, an automation company acquired by GM, has even revealed a next-gen car that lacks a steering wheel and pedals—a vehicle also intended to be part of a ride-hailing fleet.
“We definitely do envision a future where the vast majority of autonomous vehicle rides will be done as part of a shared network,” Joseph Okpaku, vice president for government relations at Lyft, said during a conference call on Wednesday. “We think that’s the best way to realize all the benefits that an autonomous future can bring.”Great idea, companies that stand to profit from it!
It’s a “very convenient” idea for the companies who are promoting it, says Don MacKenzie, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Washington. “It is basically [tying] the success of these companies to the adoption of autonomous vehicles,” he says. In other words, putting this principle in action means that “if people want the benefits of AVs, they can only get that by using shared fleets.” (Worth noting that the concept only applies to dense urban areas.)
And Michael Manville, an assistant professor of urban planning at UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, echoes that thought. “If you were Uber and Lyft, of course this is what you would embrace, right?” he asks. “If you think the car of the future is coming, and you are in that business, it’s not surprising that you would embrace principles that suggest that the new car should only be used in a manner consistent with your business model.”
The principle is blunt and vague, too, MacKenzie says. It also raises a lot questions: could an autonomous car be allowed in a dense urban area, just with the software switched off and a human driver behind the wheel? Where would you draw a line in a city and prohibit privately-owned autonomous vehicles from traveling? Would people have their own self-driving cars drop them at the line, and then return home on their own?They do have a good point though
The kind of autonomy that these companies are speaking about is different from (and higher than) vehicles with some level of assistance baked into them, from Tesla’s autopilot to more common features like adaptive cruise control. (Here’s a great explainer on the different levels, from zero to five, of vehicle automation.)
And experts say that in an uncertain future filled with more cars that can pilot themselves most of the time—referred to as level 4—the shared fleet idea has a clear appeal. “A lot of their benefits will hinge on them being shared,” Manville says. “There is a sustainability-based logic to saying that the benefits of these coming revolutions in automobility will be larger if the cars that come are more shared than privately-owned.”
Using autonomous vehicles only in shared fleets could consume less energy and be better for the environment. “We would expect that [in] the shared-fleet future,” MacKenzie says, “there’s less travel than the privately-owned AV future.” That’s because owning an autonomous vehicle could make it very cheap and convenient to take a trip, while buying that trip from a ride-hailing service would be more expensive. That, and there’s a greater chance that the company car is shared with other passengers.
In other words, the future might just be hailed, not owned.
How come we put ourselves through it? I-ing/Shutterstock
Today theme parks are big business. But with queues occasionally as long as eight hours for an average ride of under two minutes—not to mention reports of riders suffering strokes, brain deformation, and serious injury due to crashes—how come we put ourselves through it? What is it about roller coasters that some love so much, and is it an experience we tend to like less as we get older?
Enjoying roller coasters is linked to sensation seeking—the tendency to enjoy varied, novel, and intense physical experiences such as rock climbing and parachute jumping. But what sensation do roller coasters provide that is so alluring? At first glance, it may seem to be down to the experience of speed. But the evidence for linking sensation seeking to speed is not compelling. For example, when it comes to driving at speeds above the legal limit, many people do it, not just sensation seekers.
Perhaps the draw of roller coasters is the enjoyment of the visceral sensation of fear itself, much like watching a horror movie. Physical signs of fear such as a pounding heart, faster breathing, and an energy boost caused by the release of glucose are known collectively as the “fight or flight response.” We know that a roller coaster ride is likely to trigger this response thanks to researchers who measured the heart rates of riders on the double-corkscrew Coca Cola Roller in 1980s Glasgow. Heartbeats per minute more than doubled from an average 70 beforehand to 153 shortly after the ride had begun. Some older riders got uncomfortably close to what would be deemed medically unsafe for their age.
In another adrenalin-boosting pastime, novice bungee jumpers not only reported increased feelings of well-being, wakefulness, and euphoria just after completing a jump, they also had raised levels of endorphins in the blood, well known to produce feelings of intense pleasure. Interestingly, the higher the levels of endorphins that were present, the more euphoric the jumper reported feeling. Here, then, is clear evidence that people enjoy the sensations that accompany the fight or flight response within a non-threatening environment.Good vs. bad stress
And yet, paradoxically, these bungee jumpers also showed increased levels of the hormone cortisol, known to increase when people experience stress. How, then, can a person simultaneously experience stress and pleasure? The answer is that not all stress is bad. Eustress—from the Greek “eu,” meaning good, as in euphoria—is a positive kind of stress that people actively seek out.
And so, in the name of science, some asthmatic student volunteers were transported to a theme park and rode a roller coaster while their respiratory function was checked. The research findings were remarkable. While lung function predictably reduced from the screaming and general upheaval, so did the feeling of shortness of breath. This suggests that thrill seekers riding roller coasters perceive the experience as stressful in a positive way.The role of dopamine
But roller coasters are not everybody’s cup of tea. Could differences in brain chemistry explain sensation seeking behaviors? The experiment with bungee jumpers suggest that people with higher levels of endorphins feel higher levels of euphoria. But there is no evidence that resting levels of endorphins might explain sensation seeking, they are more likely a response to the thrill than a predictor of whether we enjoy it.
A recent review instead looked at the role of dopamine, another chemical messenger substance in the brain that is important in the functioning of neurological reward pathways. The review found that individuals who happen to have higher levels of dopamine also score more highly on measures of sensation seeking behaviour. While this is a correlation rather than a causation, another study found that taking a substance called haloperidol, which disrupts dopamine’s effects within the brain, led to a measurable decrease in sensation seeking behaviour.
This line of research sets out the intriguing possibility that enjoyment of intense physical experiences such as riding on roller coasters may reflect individual differences in brain chemistry. People who have higher levels of dopamine may be more prone to a number of sensation seeking behaviors, ranging from harmless roller coaster rides to taking drugs or even shoplifting.
Love it or hate it? Jacob Lund/Shutterstock
The question as to whether roller coaster riding still appeals as we get older has not been researched directly, but a recent survey looked at how keen people of different ages were on thrill-seeking holidays such as rock climbing trips. It showed that interest in these kinds of holidays peaks in early adulthood, declining with each passing decade. This indicates that older adults are less inclined to participate in activities similar to riding roller coasters. Perhaps experiencing one’s heart rate spiking dangerously close to medically accepted risk levels is not such a draw for the over 50s.
Though hard to pin down, people enjoy roller coasters thanks to a combination of speed, conquering fear, and the positive effects associated with a massive rise in physiological arousal. A roller coaster ride is a legal, generally safe, and relatively cheap means of experiencing a natural high. Understandably, people have been happy to pay money in exchange for doing it for centuries, and there is no sign of any waning in the appreciation of a bit of eustress.
Richard Stephens is a Senior Lecturer in Psychology at Keele University. This article was originally featured on The Conversation.
Is there anything worse than battery anxiety? We’re all becoming dependent on wonderful mobile technologies such as smartphones to make our lives easier and more pleasant. While these devices have become incredibly power-efficient, we’re still pretty far away from only having to recharge once every few days.
Table of Contents
Sure, a power bank is literally a “plug-and-play” product, but there are some things every user of these popular devices should know. After all, they are much more sophisticated than most of us realize. To help you be a more informed user (and buyer) of power banks, here are some essential facts you should commit to memory before using one again.Power Banks Use (Potentially Dangerous) Lithium Ion Batteries
That translates to an explosion or fire, which is pretty serious! You may have heard horror stories about houses burning down from faulty hoverboards or phones exploding in people’s pockets. That’s what happens when lithium ion batteries go bad.
The only reason the actual accident rates are acceptable comes down to the host of safety standards and technologies built into lithium devices. However, your power bank’s lithium battery can turn into a dangerous object through misuse as well. Being pierced or crushed is one surefire way of causing an internal short and subsequent flameout.
At the same time, you should only buy and use power banks that are branded and have certification from consumer safety organisations. UL certification is probably the most common standard in the USA, with other territories having their own equivalents.
Power banks needs to have several features such as overcharge, overvolt and overheating protection to be considered safe for use. Unbranded, uncertified products may have only some or none of these features. Which is a recipe for disaster!Power Bank Capacity Isn’t Always What it Seems
Power banks are almost universally rated in milliampere hours, abbreviated as “mAh”. This is a measure of how much electrical charge the battery can hold.
To see how this makes a difference we need yet another unit, the watt hour (Wh). This is the unit your electric bill is measured in and indicates the actual energy used.
Using an mAh to Wh calculator, we see that at 3.7V our 10 000 mAh power bank has 37 Wh of energy. However, our 2500 mAh phone battery charged at 5V needs 12.5 Wh. That only give us about three full recharges rather than four at best!The Amps Matter Too
There is a downside to this though. Faster discharging causes increased heat in the battery. The hotter the battery gets, the less efficient it is. So using the faster port could have a noticeable impact on how much charge you get out at the end of the day.
If you’re going to get to a place where you can recharge your power bank before you’re out of options, then it’s generally better to always use the high-amperage port. Especially if you want to actively use the phone for power hungry applications such as GPS navigation.Quick Charge Standards Make All the Difference
If you have a modern, mid-range or better smartphone, you’ll know that it can charge pretty quickly from the wall. So it may be surprising when many power banks can take a whole day to charge up. There are various reasons for this, but if you are going to use a power bank often and not simply keep one for emergencies, faster charging times are critical.Pass-Through Charging Is a Useful Feature
Which brings us to another issue. Assuming that you only have one charger, should you charge your power bank or device first? If you have a power bank with support for pass-through charging, then this is one dilemma you don’t have to face.Some Laptops Can Be Charged By SOME Power Banks
There are two main ways your laptop can be charged using a power bank. In both cases, you need a power bank with the right features. Many modern laptops, especially ultrabooks, can now be charged via USB-C. If your laptop can be charged via USB-C, which is what the included charger will use, then you can also use a powerbank that has a USB-C output and supports the USB-C PD (Power Delivery) standard.
Now, what if you have a laptop that doesn’t support charging via USB-C? Then you’ll need a special power bank with a 12V laptop output. This is a non-USB port that works with a proprietary cable provided by the power bank maker.You Can Jump Start a Car With Special Power Banks
It’s true! There are some specialized power banks out there that come with an attachment that allows you to jump-start your car. These are more expensive than your run-of-the-mill power banks and are best left in a safe spot in your car.Limited Lifespans Are The Order of the Day
Lithium batteries gradually lose their charge capacity with every recharge. It’s not like an on-off switch where the battery will work one minute and then stop the next. The total amount of power that the battery can store just gradually becomes less until it really starts to drop off.Never Worry About Running Out of Power Again
Update the detailed information about Google’s “Site:” Operator Won’t Show You Everything That’s Indexed on the Achiashop.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!